2021
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2020.3033377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liftoff Tolerant Pancake Eddy-Current Sensor for the Thickness and Spacing Measurement of Nonmagnetic Plates

Abstract: The lift-off spacing distance between the eddy current sensor and test piece will influence the detected signals and accuracy of the measurement. Various techniques including novel sensor designs, features (lift-off point of intersection, lift-off invariance phenomenon), and algorithms have been proposed for the compensation of error caused by the lift-off effect using the eddy current sensor. However, few of these have directly measured the lift-off spacing distance, particularly for the distance up to 15 mm.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum error between the analytical and experimental data is around 5.3%. Since the test piece becomes more inductive under high working frequencies (referring to [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]), the magnitude for the imaginary part of voltage changes due to the crack being much larger than (around 20 times) that of the real part. Owing to the different sensitivity, a deeper crack results in a larger magnitude of voltage change.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum error between the analytical and experimental data is around 5.3%. Since the test piece becomes more inductive under high working frequencies (referring to [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]), the magnitude for the imaginary part of voltage changes due to the crack being much larger than (around 20 times) that of the real part. Owing to the different sensitivity, a deeper crack results in a larger magnitude of voltage change.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the Dodd-Deeds formula [31] has been widely used for the inductance analysis of the air-core coil above the conductive plates [32]- [37]. For the designed eddy current sensor shown in Fig.…”
Section: Material-independent Algorithm and LII Feature A Original Analytical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P t and P r are the integral of the Bessel series and α is related to the wavenumber of the incident transverse electric (TE) plane EM wave (in the free space) [31], [37]…”
Section: Material-independent Algorithm and LII Feature A Original Analytical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum error between the analytical and experimental data is around 5.3 %. Since the test piece becomes more inductive under high working frequencies (referring to [38][39][40][41][42][43][44]), the magnitude for the imaginary part of voltage changes due to the crack is much larger than (around 20 times) that of the real part. Owing to the different sensitivity, a deeper crack results in a larger magnitude of voltage change.…”
Section: Scanned Voltage For T-r Sensor Across Notch Without Tilt Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%