2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1446788710001540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifts of Partial Characters With Cyclic Defect groups

Abstract: We count the number of lifts of an irreducible π -partial character that lies in a block with a cyclic defect group.2010 Mathematics subject classification: primary 20C20; secondary 20C15.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Write M = O p (G) and suppose that B covers the character α ∈ Irr(M ). If α is not invariant in G, then induction is a Brauer graph preserving bijection from a block B 0 of the stabilizer G α of α with defect group D to B (see, for example, [1]), and we are done by induction on |G| when α is not invariant in G.…”
Section: Abelian or Normal Defect Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Write M = O p (G) and suppose that B covers the character α ∈ Irr(M ). If α is not invariant in G, then induction is a Brauer graph preserving bijection from a block B 0 of the stabilizer G α of α with defect group D to B (see, for example, [1]), and we are done by induction on |G| when α is not invariant in G.…”
Section: Abelian or Normal Defect Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can show that if (C G (D), b) is a root of B (see [3] for a discussion of roots of π-blocks with abelian defect group), then (D, b) is a B-subgroup, and thus [3] for more details of this argument, here we are essentially repeatedly applying Lemma 5.1 of [3] Notice that in the "classical" case (where π is the complement of the prime p), Theorem 4.1 of [10] shows that the conditions in Theorem 2 imply that B is nilpotent. In the π-case, we see that the "hard" direction of Theorem 1 (which required the use of a large orbit theorem) shows that the conditions of Theorem 2 imply that D is central in N V (D), though we do not know yet if this is equivalent to B being nilpotent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%