2006
DOI: 10.1002/bip.20606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligand–DNA interaction in a nanocage of reverse micelle

Abstract: We have studied intercalation of ethidium bromide (EB) to genomic DNA encapsulated in a nanospace of an anionic AOT reverse micelle (RM). Circular dichroism (CD) study on the DNA in the RM reveals its condensed form. Here, we have used temporal decay-associated spectra (DAS) and time-resolved area normalized emission spectral (TRANES) techniques to investigate EB-binding to condensed DNA because the interference of emission from unbound EB in the RM makes conventional steady state and picosecond resolved fluor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C ( t ) function represents the temporal response of the solvent relaxation process, as occurs around the probe following its photoexcitation and the associated change in the dipole moment. To ascertain the heterogeneity in the location of KN in the RM, we further followed the time‐resolved area normalized emission spectral (TRANES) technique (14,15). TRANES is a model‐free modified version of TRES mentioned earlier.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The C ( t ) function represents the temporal response of the solvent relaxation process, as occurs around the probe following its photoexcitation and the associated change in the dipole moment. To ascertain the heterogeneity in the location of KN in the RM, we further followed the time‐resolved area normalized emission spectral (TRANES) technique (14,15). TRANES is a model‐free modified version of TRES mentioned earlier.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ascertain the heterogeneity in the location of KN in the RM, we further followed the time-resolved area normalized emission spectral (TRANES) technique (14,15). TRANES is a model-free modified version of TRES mentioned earlier.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Table 1, it is evident that the faster time constant ( < 3.5 ns) of EtBr in the duplex2 without H1 is slower than that in buffer (1.5 ns) and much faster than that of the DNA-bound EtBr through intercalative interaction (22 ns). The time constant may indicate that EtBr molecules are loosely bound to the DNA through nonintercalative interaction, namely electrostatic binding (40). However, in the duplex2-H1 complex, the loosely bound EtBr molecules are detached and show a time constant of 1.8 ns similar to that in the bulk buffer (1.5 ns).…”
Section: Nonspecific Protein-dna Interactionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An intercalative complex can usually almost fully displace EB from DNA-bound EB, and the fluorescence of EB-DNA solution will be quenched due to the fact that free EB molecules are readily quenched by the surrounding water molecules [65,66]. Previous reports indicated that EB has two DNA binding modes, primarily intercalatively and partially groove bound to the DNA [67][68][69][70][71]. EB was also reported to intercalate into DNA through interactions with the minor groove of the DNA, the displacement of EB by the titration of a drug is thus suggestive of an intercalative or minor groove binding.…”
Section: Emission Spectramentioning
confidence: 97%