2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligand-Induced Dynamic Changes in Extended PDZ Domains from NHERF1

Abstract: The multi-domain scaffolding protein NHERF1 modulates the assembly and intracellular trafficking of various transmembrane receptors and ion-transport proteins. The two PDZ domains of NHERF1 possess very different ligand-binding capabilities: PDZ1 recognizes a variety of membrane proteins with high affinity, while PDZ2 only binds limited number of target proteins. Here using NMR, we have determined the structural and dynamic mechanisms that differentiate the binding affinities of the two PDZ domains, for the Ty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
46
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
11
46
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the last four residues of CXCR2 make specific contacts to PDZ1, whereas the first threonine adopts a well-defined conformation but is not directly involved in PDZ1 recognition. This indicates that this residue may not contribute to the interaction specificity, consistent with recent finding that the residue at the corresponding peptide position does not have any contacts with PDZ1 in the solution structure of the PDZ1/synthetic CFTR peptide complex [22]. Similar to other PDZ domains [10], the specificity and affinity of the PDZ1-CXCR2 interaction are achieved mainly by the residues at positions 0 and -2 of the peptide (position 0 referring to the very C-terminal residue), whereas residues -1 and -3 appear to be important for ligand-specific interactions (see below).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Only the last four residues of CXCR2 make specific contacts to PDZ1, whereas the first threonine adopts a well-defined conformation but is not directly involved in PDZ1 recognition. This indicates that this residue may not contribute to the interaction specificity, consistent with recent finding that the residue at the corresponding peptide position does not have any contacts with PDZ1 in the solution structure of the PDZ1/synthetic CFTR peptide complex [22]. Similar to other PDZ domains [10], the specificity and affinity of the PDZ1-CXCR2 interaction are achieved mainly by the residues at positions 0 and -2 of the peptide (position 0 referring to the very C-terminal residue), whereas residues -1 and -3 appear to be important for ligand-specific interactions (see below).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There is no high-resolution structure of the full-length NHERF1. We have determined the atomic structures of the individual PDZ1, PDZ2, as well as the disordered C-tail using high-resolution NMR [41]. With the available SANS data and atomic coordinates of the PDZ domains, structural models of the full-length NHERF1(wt) or NHERF1(S339D/S340D) are first generated using the program EOM [42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, binding to the FERM domain of ezrin has been shown to affect allosteric distances between the PDZ domains, and binding to PDZ ligands has been shown to affect conformation and backbone dynamics (Farago et al. , 2010; Bhattacharya et al. , 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%