1986
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(86)80192-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligand spin polarization and antiferromagnetic coupling in transition metal dimers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
607
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 955 publications
(626 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
607
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the later two calculations, we have always checked if a broken-symmetry solution exists, 18,19 to allow the system falling into the open-shell singlet state when it is more stable. It is known that the B3LYP potential energy surface computed using the broken-symmetry approximation mimics that obtained in CASSCF calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the later two calculations, we have always checked if a broken-symmetry solution exists, 18,19 to allow the system falling into the open-shell singlet state when it is more stable. It is known that the B3LYP potential energy surface computed using the broken-symmetry approximation mimics that obtained in CASSCF calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this could certainly limit the application range of ECEPA, we must stress that spin-projection is routinely applied in Kohn-Sham density functional theory 36,37 (DFT) through Noodleman's approximation 38,39 or Yamaguchi's weighted-average approximation, 40,41 both of which remove spin-contamination only at first order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Moreover, the spin density-which serves as an additional fundamental quantity in the spin-DFT formalism commonly employed for open-shell systems-is qualitatively incorrect in some cases. [15,[37][38][39] To make things even worse, the treatment of low-spin states usually requires the use of a broken-symmetry description, [40][41][42][43] which provides an unphysical spin density by construction (see, e.g., Refs. [24,44] for a discussion).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%