2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light and heavy drinking in jurisdictions with different alcohol policy environments

Abstract: BACKGROUND A basic, yet untested tenet underlying alcohol control policies is that they should affect both light and heavy drinking, thereby shifting the entire population in a favourable direction. The aim of this study was to test this assumption in young Swiss men. METHODS Cross-sectional self-reported data-from 5755 young Swiss men participating in the Cohort Study on Substance Use Risk Factors (C-SURF), a large cohort study on young men living within 21 jurisdictions across Switzerland-were analysed via n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(135 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have indicated that alcohol control policies have a protective effect against alcohol use and related harm [18,19]. Indeed, stricter alcohol policy environments can gradually shift a population towards lighter alcohol use [18] and are also associated with lower secondhand effects of alcohol [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies have indicated that alcohol control policies have a protective effect against alcohol use and related harm [18,19]. Indeed, stricter alcohol policy environments can gradually shift a population towards lighter alcohol use [18] and are also associated with lower secondhand effects of alcohol [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have indicated that alcohol control policies have a protective effect against alcohol use and related harm [18,19]. Indeed, stricter alcohol policy environments can gradually shift a population towards lighter alcohol use [18] and are also associated with lower secondhand effects of alcohol [20]. While a large robust evidence base consistently suggests that restricting the availability and marketing and regulating the price of alcohol are the most cost-effective and easy-to-implement measures for reducing population-level alcohol consumption and harms [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], these policies often endure strong opposition from sections of the public and hence also some policy-makers [31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistently, no difference in prevalence of LLCA classes was found between the French and German speaking parts of Switzerland (data not shown). However the absence of difference in prevalence between French and German speaking parts of Switzerland does not rule out the existence of subtle cultural differences between linguistic and cantonal regions but will require further in-depth analyses including for example the cantonal legislation on drinking " [69,70]" as well as outlet density " [71]".…”
Section: Potential Reasons For Not Maturing-outmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies which have examined either alcohol policy indices or a range of policies in relation to drinking patterns have typically focused on specific sectors of the population: adolescents (Paschall et al, 2009 ), young males (Foster et al, 2019 ) mid to older age groups (Sandoval et al, 2019 ). Cross‐sectional analysis in HICs has found heavier drinking associated with less restrictive policy in young males (Foster et al, 2019 ) and more frequent drinking among adolescents was associated with less restrictive policy (Paschall et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies which have examined either alcohol policy indices or a range of policies in relation to drinking patterns have typically focused on specific sectors of the population: adolescents (Paschall et al, 2009 ), young males (Foster et al, 2019 ) mid to older age groups (Sandoval et al, 2019 ). Cross‐sectional analysis in HICs has found heavier drinking associated with less restrictive policy in young males (Foster et al, 2019 ) and more frequent drinking among adolescents was associated with less restrictive policy (Paschall et al, 2009 ). Longitudinal analysis of adolescent drinking in 33 largely HIC and regions over 12 years found a combination of alcohol control policies was more effective in reducing adolescent drinking outcomes than single policy measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%