1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00300520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light and social effects on the free-running circadian activity rhythm in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus; Primates): social masking, pseudo-splitting, and relative coordination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results described by Erkert et al (1986), Erkert and Schardt (1991) and Glass et al (2001) also support this hypothesis. According to Erkert et al (1986) and Erkert and Schardt (1991), animals showed positive masking, relative coordination and social Figure 6.…”
Section: Biological Rhythm Researchsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results described by Erkert et al (1986), Erkert and Schardt (1991) and Glass et al (2001) also support this hypothesis. According to Erkert et al (1986) and Erkert and Schardt (1991), animals showed positive masking, relative coordination and social Figure 6.…”
Section: Biological Rhythm Researchsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, vocalisations are the most efficient means of communication for contact among animals, even at greater distances (Epple 1968;Schrader & Todt 1993;Bezerra & Souto 2008;Bezerra et al 2009). Previous studies have observed entrainment, relative coordination, positive masking and pseudo-splitting of circadian motor activity rhythm in marmosets likely induced by conspecific vocalisation (Erkert et al 1986;Erkert & Schardt 1991). The authors suggested that sound cues are weak zeitgebers for marmosets and that the effectiveness of a social zeitgeber in this species is dependent on the degree of acquaintance and proximity of endogenous periods among animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Mechanistically, such changes in melatonin concentrations could either be achieved via suppression of melatonin by light [29,30], but not in nightactive birds, or by an activity feedback on melatonin secretion itself [31][32][33][34]. An activity feedback could explain the fact that Lapland longspurs (Calcarius lapponicus) breeding under continuous daylight in the high Arctic have strongly suppressed overall melatonin levels, but nevertheless show slight but significant daily melatonin rhythms [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of the light-dark cycle (in constant light or dark), nonphotic stimuli such as activity, wheel running, food availability, and social stimuli, can entrain the endogenous circadian clock located in the SCN (e.g., Mistlberger 1991, Mrosovsky 1988 or mask the endogenous circadian system (e.g., Eckert et al 1986, Gattermann & Weinandy 1997, Refinetti et al 1992. Masking (Aschoff 1960) is defined as "any process that distorts the original output from the internal clock whether this originates from inside or outside the body" (Minors & Waterhouse 1989).…”
Section: Plasticity Of Diel Rhythms (Laboratory Experiments)mentioning
confidence: 99%