2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light, but Not Nutrients, Drives Seasonal Congruence of Taxonomic and Functional Diversity of Phytoplankton in a Eutrophic Highland Lake in China

Abstract: Microcystis, Psephonema, and Mougeotia). Instead, the entire phytoplankton community assemblages were important in the pattern. Most diversity indices of taxonomic and functional groupings were significantly correlated with solar irradiance, but not nutrient concentrations. Because the lake is eutrophic and there were already sufficient nutrients available, additional nutrients had little effect on seasonal taxonomic and functional diversity of phytoplankton in Lake Erhai.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may influence spatial and temporal distribution (e.g., Clegg et al, 2007 ); indeed, a relatively widespread behavioural and physiological predilection for quite low light generally supports their often-common occurrence in such conditions (e.g., Clegg et al, 2012 ). It can also have a crucial impact on growth and survival (e.g., Ensminger et al, 2005 ), with differences between species not only being energetically beneficial (e.g., Richardson et al, 1983 ), influencing fitness (e.g., Geider et al, 2009 ), and the ability of this family to thrive in many different environments (with applied implications: e.g., Smayda, 1997 ; Benning, 2015 ), but it may also shape niche processes, competition, succession, community composition, and ecosystem dynamics (e.g., Litchman and Klausmeier, 2008 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Ajani et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may influence spatial and temporal distribution (e.g., Clegg et al, 2007 ); indeed, a relatively widespread behavioural and physiological predilection for quite low light generally supports their often-common occurrence in such conditions (e.g., Clegg et al, 2012 ). It can also have a crucial impact on growth and survival (e.g., Ensminger et al, 2005 ), with differences between species not only being energetically beneficial (e.g., Richardson et al, 1983 ), influencing fitness (e.g., Geider et al, 2009 ), and the ability of this family to thrive in many different environments (with applied implications: e.g., Smayda, 1997 ; Benning, 2015 ), but it may also shape niche processes, competition, succession, community composition, and ecosystem dynamics (e.g., Litchman and Klausmeier, 2008 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Ajani et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High FD PA was related to high light intensity and zooplankton biomass (low water level) and to low productivity (high water level) in floodplain lakes (Cardoso et al, 2017). If the FD BV is considered, a positive correlation with light is provided in an eutrophic lake (Wang et al, 2020). The functional phytoplankton composition based on biovolume changed more than 200 km downstream in a tropical river, suggesting that damming can filter species by their traits Graco-Roza et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some studies have examined phytoplankton patterns and mechanisms underlying FD compare to taxonomical diversity (TD), although differences in functionality are easily distinguishable from morphological traits (Weithoff, 2003;Kruk et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2020). The majority of research on phytoplankton FD is based on identities (presence-absence, FD PA , e.g., Bergkemper et al, 2018;Santos et al, 2015;Cardoso et al, 2017;Ye et al, 2019) and, in minor extension, on abundance or biovolume, FD BV (Santos et al, 2015;Graco-Roza et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020). FD PA and FD BV have been indicated as driven by similar environmental variables, such as water temperature, productivity, light, flushing, grazing, or macrophytes, that can mediate changes in phytoplankton assemblages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous studies have documented many factors that contribute to phytoplankton diversity, which mostly include alpha diversity, such as salinity (Elliot and Whitfield, 2011;Mousing et al, 2016;Bode et al, 2017;Stefanidou et al, 2020), nutrients (Bode et al, 2017), organic matter variables (Bode et al, 2017), hydromorphology (Elliot and Whitfield, 2011), sunlight (Wang et al, 2020), and spatial structure (Moresco et al, 2017;Yang et al, 2017). However, there is only limited information on potential factors that influence beta diversity patterns (Mousing et al, 2016;Moresco et al, 2017;Yang et al, 2017;Stefanidou et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020), and even less on the different factors between alpha and beta diversity. It is important to note that the significant role that nutrients concentrations play in phytoplankton diversity is widely recognized among researchers (Huppert et al, 2002(Huppert et al, , 2005Ji et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%