2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232112921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-Controlled Modulation and Analysis of Neuronal Functions

Abstract: Light is an extraordinary tool allowing us to read out and control neuronal functions thanks to its unique properties: it has a great degree of bioorthogonality and is minimally invasive; it can be precisely delivered with high spatial and temporal precision; and it can be used simultaneously or consequently at multiple wavelengths and locations [...]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bar histograms show means ± SEM of 10 (b), 3-5 (c), 4-5 (d), 4-5 (e), 5-8 (f), 10 (g) mice per group. Two-way ANOVA: (b) sham vs CCI, F(1,36)=16.04; p=0.0003; ipsi vs contra, F(1,36)=7.304; p=0.0104; interaction F(1,36)=5.062, p=0.0307; (c) sham vs CCI, F(1,11)=0.5569; p=0.4712; vehicle vs VU0360172, F(1,11)=5.741, p=0.0355; interaction (F1,11)=0.8168, p=0.3855; (d) sham vs CCI, F(1,15)=1.075; p=0.3163; vehicle vs VU0360172, F(1,15)=6.452, p=0.0226; interaction (F1,15)=0.7034, p=0.4148; (e) sham vs CCI, F(1,13)=3.951; p=0.0683; vehicle vs VU0360172, F(1,13)=11.21, p=0.0052; interaction (F1,13)=0.1553, p=0.6999; (f) sham vs CCI, F(1,22)=0.01997, p=0.8889; vehicle vs VU0360172, F(1,22)=8.888, p=0.0069; interaction (F1,22)=6.099, p=0.0218; (g) sham vs CCI, F(1,36)=0.4861, p=0.4902; vehicle vs VU0360172, F(1,36)=4.557, p=0.0397; interaction (F1,36)=2.313, p=0.1370. *p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post hoc test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bar histograms show means ± SEM of 10 (b), 3-5 (c), 4-5 (d), 4-5 (e), 5-8 (f), 10 (g) mice per group. Two-way ANOVA: (b) sham vs CCI, F(1,36)=16.04; p=0.0003; ipsi vs contra, F(1,36)=7.304; p=0.0104; interaction F(1,36)=5.062, p=0.0307; (c) sham vs CCI, F(1,11)=0.5569; p=0.4712; vehicle vs VU0360172, F(1,11)=5.741, p=0.0355; interaction (F1,11)=0.8168, p=0.3855; (d) sham vs CCI, F(1,15)=1.075; p=0.3163; vehicle vs VU0360172, F(1,15)=6.452, p=0.0226; interaction (F1,15)=0.7034, p=0.4148; (e) sham vs CCI, F(1,13)=3.951; p=0.0683; vehicle vs VU0360172, F(1,13)=11.21, p=0.0052; interaction (F1,13)=0.1553, p=0.6999; (f) sham vs CCI, F(1,22)=0.01997, p=0.8889; vehicle vs VU0360172, F(1,22)=8.888, p=0.0069; interaction (F1,22)=6.099, p=0.0218; (g) sham vs CCI, F(1,36)=0.4861, p=0.4902; vehicle vs VU0360172, F(1,36)=4.557, p=0.0397; interaction (F1,36)=2.313, p=0.1370. *p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post hoc test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using light-sensitive drugs, it is possible to optimize the efficacy of new therapeutic agents and minimize their adverse effects resulting from widespread actions after systemic administration. The use of photopharmacology-based approaches to interrogate receptors in brain is attractive due to the possibilities of manipulating the activity of specific localizations during defined times ( 10, 11 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%