2021
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202101176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light‐Driven gem Hydrogenation: An Orthogonal Entry into “Second‐Generation” Ruthenium Carbene Catalysts for Olefin Metathesis

Abstract: The newly discovered light‐driven gem hydrogenation of alkynes opens an unconventional yet efficient entry into five‐coordinate Grubbs‐type ruthenium carbene complexes with cis‐disposed chloride ligands. Representatives of this class featuring a chelate substructure formed by an iodo‐substituted benzylidene unit react with (substituted) 2‐isopropoxystyrene to give prototypical “second‐generation” Grubbs‐Hoveyda complexes for olefin metathesis. The new approach to this venerable catalyst family is safe and vers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, however, the yield of complex 3 a was rather low, likely because of the clash between the ethyl substituent on the incipient carbene ligand and the N‐aryl group of the NHC (Scheme 2A) [11] . Therefore, an indirect route was pursued, in which the actual gem ‐hydrogenation step affords the iodo‐chelate complex 4 in the first place, wherein the ruthenacyclic array is turned by 90 °C to prevent any such interligand repulsion; indeed, this reaction proved much more efficient (Scheme 2B) [13] . Subsequent cross metathesis of 4 with styrenes of type 5 leads to prototype Hoveyda‐Grubbs‐type catalysts 3 b , c in good overall yield [12, 14] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Initially, however, the yield of complex 3 a was rather low, likely because of the clash between the ethyl substituent on the incipient carbene ligand and the N‐aryl group of the NHC (Scheme 2A) [11] . Therefore, an indirect route was pursued, in which the actual gem ‐hydrogenation step affords the iodo‐chelate complex 4 in the first place, wherein the ruthenacyclic array is turned by 90 °C to prevent any such interligand repulsion; indeed, this reaction proved much more efficient (Scheme 2B) [13] . Subsequent cross metathesis of 4 with styrenes of type 5 leads to prototype Hoveyda‐Grubbs‐type catalysts 3 b , c in good overall yield [12, 14] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] Therefore, an indirect route was pursued, in which the actual gem-hydrogenation step affords the iodochelate complex 4 in the first place, wherein the ruthenacyclic array is turned by 90 °C to prevent any such interligand repulsion; indeed, this reaction proved much more efficient (Scheme 2B). [13] Subsequent cross metathesis of 4 with styrenes of type 5 leads to prototype Hoveyda-Grubbs-type catalysts 3 b, c in good overall yield. [12,14] Despite this significant advance, it seemed equally relevant to investigate the fate of the ruthenium, because a better understanding for potentially competing processes might also help to improve the reaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… The conversion of the receiving C atom into a methylene group is accompanied by the formation of a discrete metal carbene at the adjacent position. For the time being, such “ gem -hydrogention” reactions have been accomplished with [Cp X RuCl] (or closely related metal fragments) , as well as with [NHC­(η 6 -cymene)­RuCl 2 ]; this latter system is photochemically driven and opens an unconventional entry into second-generation Grubbs-type catalysts. , The use of [Cp X RuCl], in contrast, provides access to piano-stool ruthenium carbene complexes, the electrophilic character of which manifests itself in multifarious reactivity (Scheme ): so far, it could be harnessed in the form of hydrogenative cyclopropanation, , hydrogenative metathesis, , hydrogenative heterocycle syntheses, , hydrogenative ring expansion reactions, and hydrogenative rearrangements, all of which are conceptually new types of transformations; some of them are even counterintuitive when judged on the basis of conventional chemical logic…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 9 , 10 ] A second system employing [(NHC)(η 6 ‐cymene)MCl 2 ] (M=Ru, Os; NHC=N‐heterocyclic carbene) is photochemically driven; it opens an unconventional hydrogenative entry into “second generation” Grubbs carbenes for use in olefin metathesis. [ 11 , 12 ]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%