1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.48.4881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-front QCD. II. Two-component theory

Abstract: The light-front gauge A; = 0 is known to be a convenient gauge in practical QCD calculations for short-distance behavior, but there are persistent concerns about its use because of its "singular" nature. The study of nonperturbative field theory quantizing on a light-front plane for hadronic bound states requires one to gain a priori systematic control of such gauge singularities. In the second paper of this series we study the two-component old-fashioned perturbation theory and various severe infrared diverge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
130
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that in the light-cone gaugen · A n,q = 0 these Feynman rules are the complete set, since interactions of a collinear quark with three or more collinear gluons vanish. In this gauge similar Feynman rules for collinear gluons have been obtained in the framework of light cone QCD [17]. However, the Feynman rules in Fig.…”
Section: The Effective Theorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Note that in the light-cone gaugen · A n,q = 0 these Feynman rules are the complete set, since interactions of a collinear quark with three or more collinear gluons vanish. In this gauge similar Feynman rules for collinear gluons have been obtained in the framework of light cone QCD [17]. However, the Feynman rules in Fig.…”
Section: The Effective Theorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[21]. In this paper, however, we choose a representation (1.4) from which it is easy to extract information of the 1+1 dimensional results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated before, the cutoff at x 0 is imposed for the numerical calculation and has a small effect on the result. If, instead of imposing a cutoff on transverse momentum, , we imposed a cutoff on the invariant mass [15], then the divergences at x 1 would have been regulated by a nonzero photon mass [28]. The DVCS amplitude at x 1 also receives a contribution from the single-particle sector of the Fock space [4,16,17,21], which we did not take into account.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Fourier Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%