2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-55819-1_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light Heterogeneity and Plants: from Ecophysiology to Species Coexistence and Biodiversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
88
1
10

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
1
88
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the size of this light differential is relatively small, supporting the idea that plant adaptations to shade may be less important in TDF than in wet forests (Gerhardt 1996, Swaine et al 1990). In TDF it may be more useful to study plant adaptations to shade in relation to edaphic-and atmospheric drought (Poorter 2009, Valladares 2003.…”
Section: Potential Implications For Species Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the size of this light differential is relatively small, supporting the idea that plant adaptations to shade may be less important in TDF than in wet forests (Gerhardt 1996, Swaine et al 1990). In TDF it may be more useful to study plant adaptations to shade in relation to edaphic-and atmospheric drought (Poorter 2009, Valladares 2003.…”
Section: Potential Implications For Species Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species' inherent differences in light requirement underlie the major changes in vegetation composition during succession (Sack & Grubb 2001;Valladares 2003). Because light availability in established plant communities is often very low, in the order of 0.5-2% of above-canopy light, shade tolerance has traditionally been thought to depend on traits that enhance light harvesting efficiency (Bazzaz 1979;Givnish 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using categorical variables to quantify leaf position does not sufficiently capture the differences in microenvironments experienced by leaves throughout the entire three-dimensional space of a canopy. For example, leaves on the exterior of canopies alter both the quantity and quality of light received by leaves on the interior of canopies (Le Roux et al, 2001;Baldocchi et al, 2002;Valladares, 2003). Although multiple methods exist for quantifying leaf position within a canopy, they are often challenging to implement due to both financial and/or logistical constraints in the field.…”
Section: Applications In Plant Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%