2022
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-Induced Patterning of Electroactive Bacterial Biofilms

Abstract: Electroactive bacterial biofilms can function as living biomaterials that merge the functionality of living cells with electronic components. However, the development of such advanced living electronics has been challenged by the inability to control the geometry of electroactive biofilms relative to solid-state electrodes. Here, we developed a lithographic strategy to pattern conductive biofilms of Shewanella oneidensis by controlling aggregation protein CdrAB expression with a blue light-induced genetic circ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
6
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the measured conduction currents (which did not account for flavin contributions) and using the full biofilm volume to define the conduction path (rather than only the cellular membrane surface), a biofilm conductivity (σ) of several nS/cm was estimated for S. oneidensis . Using the Nernst-Einstein relation ( SI Appendix , SI Materials and Methods ) to relate the apparent diffusion coefficient and conductivity ( 20 ), our calculated D ap of ∼1 µm 2 /s translates to σ ∼ 7 nS/cm, in remarkable agreement with the electrochemical gating measurements ( 59 ). These comparisons suggest that the simulated combination of electron hopping and cytochrome diffusion can explain many features of the observed redox conductivity of bacterial biofilms, at least in the case of S. oneidensis .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the measured conduction currents (which did not account for flavin contributions) and using the full biofilm volume to define the conduction path (rather than only the cellular membrane surface), a biofilm conductivity (σ) of several nS/cm was estimated for S. oneidensis . Using the Nernst-Einstein relation ( SI Appendix , SI Materials and Methods ) to relate the apparent diffusion coefficient and conductivity ( 20 ), our calculated D ap of ∼1 µm 2 /s translates to σ ∼ 7 nS/cm, in remarkable agreement with the electrochemical gating measurements ( 59 ). These comparisons suggest that the simulated combination of electron hopping and cytochrome diffusion can explain many features of the observed redox conductivity of bacterial biofilms, at least in the case of S. oneidensis .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Taking an electron transport rate of 10 4 s −1 and a cytochrome concentration resulting from a representative fractional loading X = 0.5, this procedure results in D ap ∼1 µm 2 /s, which is on the lower end of D ap reported for electroactive bacterial biofilms ( 22 ). More recently, estimates of the redox conductivity of S. oneidensis have become available from electrochemical gating measurements of light patterned biofilms bridging interdigitated electrodes ( 59 ). From the measured conduction currents (which did not account for flavin contributions) and using the full biofilm volume to define the conduction path (rather than only the cellular membrane surface), a biofilm conductivity (σ) of several nS/cm was estimated for S. oneidensis .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above use cases compellingly illustrate how lightregulated gene expression can establish spatial patterns in bacterial communities. Beyond their utility in basic research, these approaches garner interest for the production of structured materials, as already hinted at in certain of the above examples (Zhao et al, 2022;Figure 5C). Several studies employed the CsgA protein which upon secretion forms so-called curli fibrils on the bacterial cell surface and mediates biofilm formation (Chen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Bacterial Photography and Structured Materialsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Beyond E. coli, the widely used CcaRS TCS (Tabor et al, 2011) enabled light-regulated gene expression in Synechocystis cyanobacteria (Abe et al, 2014;Miyake et al, 2014;Badary et al, 2015) and P. aeruginosa (Hueso- Gil et al, 2020). Likewise, the pDawn setup (Ohlendorf et al, 2012) underpinned applications in the probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 strain (Magaraci et al, 2014;Alizadeh et al, 2020;Cui et al, 2021), P. aeruginosa (Pu et al, 2018), the marine bacterium Vibrio natriegens (Tschirhart et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020), and Shewanella oneidensis (Zhao et al, 2022). Similarly, EL222 was used in Sinorhizobium meliloti (Pirhanov et al, 2021).…”
Section: Applications Of Optogenetic Expression Control In Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation