2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2008
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-invariant fitting of active appearance models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using an explicit local illumination model would probably cause instabilities: Local intensity variations would both be explained by the warp and the illumination model. A solution might be to use invariant images as proposed in [25] and very recently to Active Appearance Models in [26]. The efficiency of the proposed approach could also be improved by using the ESM algorithm for the minimization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Using an explicit local illumination model would probably cause instabilities: Local intensity variations would both be explained by the warp and the illumination model. A solution might be to use invariant images as proposed in [25] and very recently to Active Appearance Models in [26]. The efficiency of the proposed approach could also be improved by using the ESM algorithm for the minimization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Examples include template matching handled in the frequency domain [6], modifications to correlation-based statistics [13,16], conquer-and-divide approaches to pixel space by breaking down the entire pixel space into smaller subspaces and subjecting them to localised matching [17], or even methods of matching stereo images where richer problem spaces are considered [2]. More recent alternative global or subglobal methods [11,12] rely on a number of restrictive assumptions and thus cannot handle more general non-homogeneous deviations. At present, to the best of our knowledge, no matching score for loosely constrained non-homogeneous contrast and offset deviations has been proposed 1 .…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model fails in the presence of illumination changes and several solutions have been proposed to address this issue such as structure-texture decomposition [17], LightInvariant [11] or CENSUS [12,18] transforms. Our feature-based data term is independent of the direct term used so we restrict ourselves to the simple model (14) for clarity.…”
Section: Priorsmentioning
confidence: 99%