2016
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.143719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light level impacts locomotor biomechanics in a secondarily diurnal gecko,Rhoptropus afer

Abstract: Locomotion through complex habitats relies on the continuous feedback from a number of sensory systems, including vision. Animals face a visual trade-off between acuity and light sensitivity that depends on light levels, which will dramatically impact the ability to process information and move quickly through a habitat, making ambient illumination an incredibly important ecological factor. Despite this, there is a paucity of data examining ambient light in the context of locomotor dynamics. There have been se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise habitat clutter data for geckos are unavailable, hence a formal test of this hypothesis is still wanted, but it is possible that the ground-dwelling/climbing axis of eye diversity [ 6 ] is related to habitat clutter, as ground-dwelling specialists tend to be more common in open habitats [ 22 ]. We propose that habitat and DAP jointly drive visual range, locomotor speed [ 24 , 25 ], and, ultimately, eye size evolution, offering a new perspective on Leuckart's Law [ 26 ]. However, even with full understanding of the photic environment, eye size can follow different evolutionary trajectories, as size is not the only determinant of visual performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise habitat clutter data for geckos are unavailable, hence a formal test of this hypothesis is still wanted, but it is possible that the ground-dwelling/climbing axis of eye diversity [ 6 ] is related to habitat clutter, as ground-dwelling specialists tend to be more common in open habitats [ 22 ]. We propose that habitat and DAP jointly drive visual range, locomotor speed [ 24 , 25 ], and, ultimately, eye size evolution, offering a new perspective on Leuckart's Law [ 26 ]. However, even with full understanding of the photic environment, eye size can follow different evolutionary trajectories, as size is not the only determinant of visual performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%