2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light olefins from renewable resources: Selective catalytic dehydration of bioethanol to propylene over zeolite and transition metal oxide catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the high coking tendency and associated catalyst deactivation are clear disadvantages of zeolites [22,23]. Modifying zeolites with various promoters such as lanthanum [7], gallium [24], and phosphorous [25] can change the acidity and the selectivity toward the desired product. The addition of a second metal promoter with an optimum amount may provide a more diverse control of the surface acidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the high coking tendency and associated catalyst deactivation are clear disadvantages of zeolites [22,23]. Modifying zeolites with various promoters such as lanthanum [7], gallium [24], and phosphorous [25] can change the acidity and the selectivity toward the desired product. The addition of a second metal promoter with an optimum amount may provide a more diverse control of the surface acidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of a second metal promoter with an optimum amount may provide a more diverse control of the surface acidity. Another advantage of these promoted catalysts is their lower coking tendency compared to base catalysts with rapid inactivation while the promoted catalysts maintain their activity for a longer period of time [8,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of fuels and raw chemicals conventionally produced from petroleum can be obtained from these raw materials. Bio‐ethanol is well‐known for its potential as an alternative fuel, and also noteworthy is the technological development of bio‐ethanol conversion into hydrocarbons, chemical platforms, and H 2 (via steam reforming) . However, bio‐ethanol valorization is limited by the availability of fermentable biomass, given that sugars production from lignocellulosic biomass (which would not interfere with the human and animal feed chain) is still under development …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research work on the conversion of ETP over zeolite and transition metal oxide catalysts were reviewed by Li. The existing researches show that ZSM-5 is the best candidate for propylene production (Li et al, 2016). Levyne (LEV), which belongs to CHA type zeolite, exhibit the specific shape selectivity for the transformation of methanol or ethanol (Venkatathri and Yoo, 2008;Inoue et al, 2009;Bhawe et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%