1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4073(98)00011-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light scattering by nonspherical raindrops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to [21] and [23], a key assumption to using the correlation between the RR and the atmospheric optical extinction derived from fixed-orientation ceilometer measurements (RR-to-extinction models; hereafter, RR-α models) is that droplets maintain symmetry in the direction of fall (i.e., assumption of small (spherical) drops and no canting [10, p. 249]). Otherwise, geometric optics calculations of light scattering by nonspherical raindrops reveal a strong dependence on the phase matrix that invalidate ceilometer measurements [24], [25]. More recently, Roy and Bissonnette [26] showed that rain extinction coefficients and depolarization ratios varied strongly depending on the lidar zenith angle (0-75 • ), demonstrating the importance of performing measurements with constant lidar scan direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [21] and [23], a key assumption to using the correlation between the RR and the atmospheric optical extinction derived from fixed-orientation ceilometer measurements (RR-to-extinction models; hereafter, RR-α models) is that droplets maintain symmetry in the direction of fall (i.e., assumption of small (spherical) drops and no canting [10, p. 249]). Otherwise, geometric optics calculations of light scattering by nonspherical raindrops reveal a strong dependence on the phase matrix that invalidate ceilometer measurements [24], [25]. More recently, Roy and Bissonnette [26] showed that rain extinction coefficients and depolarization ratios varied strongly depending on the lidar zenith angle (0-75 • ), demonstrating the importance of performing measurements with constant lidar scan direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is not necessary to consider drops that are too small to reflect a significant amount of light [15]. Finally, strong visibility improvement can be achieved well below perfect accuracy of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to correlate RR and atmospheric optical extinction (RR-to-extinction models; hereafter, RR- models) retrieved form fixed-orientation ceilometer signals, must be kept in mind that droplets maintan symmetry in the fall direction [Rensch and Long, 1970;Vasseur and Gibbins, 1996]. Otherwise, geometric optics calculations of light scattering by non-spherical raindrops reveal a strong dependence on the phase matrix that invalidate ceilometer measurements [Kokhanovsky and Macke, 1997;Macke and Großklaus, 1998]. Besides it is worth noting the importance of the fixed-orientation, since rain extinction coefficients vary strongly depending on the laser beam zenith angle [Roy and Bissonnette, 2001].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%