2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2009.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light scattering by particles suspended in the sea: The role of particle size and density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4B). Bowers et al (2009) (Boss et al 2009c), whereas a large fraction of the particle mass might be contained in larger particles to which the C-Star is relatively insensitive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4B). Bowers et al (2009) (Boss et al 2009c), whereas a large fraction of the particle mass might be contained in larger particles to which the C-Star is relatively insensitive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seasonal changes of b m p in a low-turbidity station in the western English Channel have been related to the composition of particulate organic matter, POM (Martinez-Vicente et al 2010). Bowers et al (2009) show that the variability of b m p in a shallow shelf sea dominated by mineral aggregates is mainly explained by changes in the aggregate apparent density, r ag (dry weight : wet volume ratio of material in the aggregate), whereas particle size has only little effect on b m p . Note that there is a difference between r ap and r ag .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Babin et al (1993) investigated the horizontal variability of the specific absorption coefficient of phytoplankton (i.e., absorption coefficient normalized by concentration of chlorophyll + phaeopigments) in surface waters during the summer of 1989and 1990. Nieke et al (1997 reported high values (up to 3 m −1 ) of particulate beam attenuation coefficients (c SPM ) and inverse relationships between salinity, c SPM , and CDOM absorption coefficients (a CDOM ) based on measurements done during summer of 1990.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, four techniques have been proposed for characterizing particle size distribution (PSD) and/or chemical composition of SPM based on optical parameters: (1) optical proxies (e.g., the spectral slope of the mass-specific particulate absorption coefficient, γ , the spectral slope of the particulate absorption coefficient, Svis, and particulate backscattering/scattering ratio) Twardowski et al, 2001;Loisel et al, 2006;Estapa et al, 2012), (2) massspecific optical coefficients (e.g., mass-specific particulate scattering, backscattering and beam attenuation coefficients) (Bowers et al, 2009;Neukermans et al, 2012), (3) particulate volume scattering functions (Zhang et al, 2014), and (4) water-leaving polarized reflectance (Loisel et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%