Abstract:Neuropsychiatric behaviors are common in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and make both professional and lay caregiving difficult. Light therapy has been somewhat successful in ameliorating disruptive behaviors. This randomized trial tested the effects of morning or afternoon bright light exposure compared with usual indoor light on the presence, frequency, severity, and occupational disruptiveness of neuropsychiatric behaviors in nursing home residents with AD. Light was administered for 1 hr daily (Monda… Show more
“…Barrick et al [56] showed that ambient bright light is not effective in reducing agitation in institutionalized persons with dementia and may exacerbate this behavioral symptom in severely demented patients. Another study that described a light treatment in nursing home residents with AD showed small changes in neuropsychiatric behaviors (e.g., aggression, depression, eating disorders); however, the authors concluded that the magnitude of these changes do not represent clinically significant findings [57]. Onega et al [58] showed that bright light exposure was associated with significant improvement in depression and agitation, while participants receiving low-intensity light displayed no significant changes or higher levels of depression and agitation.…”
Background: Bright light treatment is a therapeutic intervention mainly used to treat sleep and circadian disturbances in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. Recently, a handful of studies also focused on the effect on cognition and behavior. Conflicting findings are reported in the literature, and no definite conclusions have been drawn about its specific therapeutic effect. Summary: The aim of this review is to provide a critical evaluation of available evidence in this field, highlighting the specific characteristics of effective bright light treatment. Eligible studies were required to assess at least one of the following outcome measures: sleep, cognition, mood, and/or behavior (e.g., depression, agitation). A total of 32 articles were included in this systematic review and identified as research intervention studies about light treatment in AD. The quality of the papers was evaluated based on the US Preventive Service Task Force guidelines. Key Messages: Overall, the current literature suggests that the effects of light treatment in AD patients are mixed and may be influenced by several factors, but with a general trend toward a positive effect. Bright light seems to be a promising intervention treatment without significant adverse effects; therefore, further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed taking into account the highlighted recommendations.
“…Barrick et al [56] showed that ambient bright light is not effective in reducing agitation in institutionalized persons with dementia and may exacerbate this behavioral symptom in severely demented patients. Another study that described a light treatment in nursing home residents with AD showed small changes in neuropsychiatric behaviors (e.g., aggression, depression, eating disorders); however, the authors concluded that the magnitude of these changes do not represent clinically significant findings [57]. Onega et al [58] showed that bright light exposure was associated with significant improvement in depression and agitation, while participants receiving low-intensity light displayed no significant changes or higher levels of depression and agitation.…”
Background: Bright light treatment is a therapeutic intervention mainly used to treat sleep and circadian disturbances in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. Recently, a handful of studies also focused on the effect on cognition and behavior. Conflicting findings are reported in the literature, and no definite conclusions have been drawn about its specific therapeutic effect. Summary: The aim of this review is to provide a critical evaluation of available evidence in this field, highlighting the specific characteristics of effective bright light treatment. Eligible studies were required to assess at least one of the following outcome measures: sleep, cognition, mood, and/or behavior (e.g., depression, agitation). A total of 32 articles were included in this systematic review and identified as research intervention studies about light treatment in AD. The quality of the papers was evaluated based on the US Preventive Service Task Force guidelines. Key Messages: Overall, the current literature suggests that the effects of light treatment in AD patients are mixed and may be influenced by several factors, but with a general trend toward a positive effect. Bright light seems to be a promising intervention treatment without significant adverse effects; therefore, further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed taking into account the highlighted recommendations.
“…Thirty-one RCTs met the inclusion criteria [40][41][42][43][44] and five main intervention categories emerged (Table 1): psychoeducational [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], physical activity [22][23][24][25], sensorial [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], staff-focused [35,36,37,38,40] and complex [41][42][43][44] (Table 2). Nineteen studies were two-arm RCTs [14,15,[17][18][19][21][22][23]25,26,[29][30][...…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nineteen studies were two-arm RCTs [14,15,[17][18][19][21][22][23]25,26,[29][30][31][32]35,38,40,41,43] and 12 were three-arm or more [13,16,20,24,27,28,33,34,36,37,42,44].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified four therapy types: light [26][27][28][29], music [30,31], multi-sensory stimuli [32], and therapeutic touch [33,34]. Nine trials met the inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Sensorial Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four RCTs tested the effect of Bright Light Therapy (BLT) on behavioral symptoms [26][27][28][29]. Two 3-arm RCTs compared the effect of morning BLT and afternoon/evening BLT with normal light [27,28]. The other two compared one single type of BLT with usual light [26,29].…”
There is insufficient evidence to assess the value of light therapy for people with dementia. Most of the available studies are not of high methodological quality and further research is required.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.