2002
DOI: 10.1177/154193120204602214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light Vehicle-Heavy Vehicle Interactions: A Preliminary Assessment Using Critical Incident Analysis

Abstract: ForewordThe purpose of this study was to investigate driving behaviors that lead to critical events (e.g., near misses) when trucks and light vehicles interact on the highway. The results suggest that efforts at addressing light vehicle-heavy vehicle (LV-HV) interaction incidents should focus on the driving behaviors of the light vehicle drivers, as well as heavy vehicle drivers. Further, it is recommended that heavy vehicle drivers may also benefit from improved driver training that includes instruction on de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A safety-related event was Intervention operationally defined as an unexpected event resulting in a close call requiring fast action on th part of the driver to avoid a crash, near-crash, or other traffic event. Safety-related events are likely to require emergency steering or braking, or both, by at least one of the drivers involved Safety-related events are far more numerous than crashes, in which the driver could not avoid a collision through their emergency actions, or lack thereof (Hanowski, Keisler, & Wierwille, 2004). Using an alpha of 0.05 for a two-tailed t test and given the estimated effect size of 1.18, a power of 0.95 would be reached with 30 participants (Lipsey, 1990; page 91).…”
Section: Power Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A safety-related event was Intervention operationally defined as an unexpected event resulting in a close call requiring fast action on th part of the driver to avoid a crash, near-crash, or other traffic event. Safety-related events are likely to require emergency steering or braking, or both, by at least one of the drivers involved Safety-related events are far more numerous than crashes, in which the driver could not avoid a collision through their emergency actions, or lack thereof (Hanowski, Keisler, & Wierwille, 2004). Using an alpha of 0.05 for a two-tailed t test and given the estimated effect size of 1.18, a power of 0.95 would be reached with 30 participants (Lipsey, 1990; page 91).…”
Section: Power Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These incidents are then classified as either safety-related errors or as near crashes (in surface transportation applications). Hanowski et al (2003) operationally defined safety-related errors for driving research as "precautionary braking, swerving, or lane change with minimal risk of a near crash". Dingus et al (1995) also operationally defined a near miss as "a rapid controlled or uncontrolled acceleration, deceleration, swerve, lane change, or stopping to avoid a crash".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study builds off a previous project that classified critical incidents (crashes and near-crashes) recorded in two fatigue studies, one with Local/Short Haul (L/SH) drivers and the other involving Sleeper Berth (SB) drivers (Hanowski, Keisler, and Wierwille, 2004). The two truck studies involved instrumentation in the truck and recorded events from the HV driver's perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies that have investigated LV-HV interactions have used crash database analyses, where the database consists of entries from police accident reports (e.g., Blower, 1998;Stuster, 1999). Hanowski, Keisler, and Wierwille (2004) used a naturalistic approach to investigate LV-HV interactions including crashes and near-crashes. In their study, trucks were instrumented with a variety of data collection equipment, including video cameras mounted in and around the truck cab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation