2017 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/eucap.2017.7928799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-weight wireless power transfer for mid-air charging of drones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another critical aspect is the misalignment of the WPT coils due to an imprecise landing of the drone that can lead to a reduction of the coupling factor between coils, and therefore of the electrical performance. These two aspects have been investigated in the recent past, and several solutions have been presented [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. All the proposed solutions were mainly derived by previous WPT applications in other fields such as automotive or consumer electronics, and the main focus was on adapting these techniques to drones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another critical aspect is the misalignment of the WPT coils due to an imprecise landing of the drone that can lead to a reduction of the coupling factor between coils, and therefore of the electrical performance. These two aspects have been investigated in the recent past, and several solutions have been presented [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. All the proposed solutions were mainly derived by previous WPT applications in other fields such as automotive or consumer electronics, and the main focus was on adapting these techniques to drones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], a miniaturized receiving coil is placed on the landing leg of a drone, and an array of primary coils is adopted to improve the performances of the system. A charging system based on radio frequency (RF) transmission is presented in [18] and [22], while the capacitive WPT system is adopted in [19]. The main disadvantages of the RF system is the compliance with electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)/electromagnetic interference (EMI) regulations, while the maximum output power and the low efficiency is the main limitation of capacitive technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the recharging solution to extend individual platform flight time and a multiagent scheme for constant operation, impressive operation times have been demonstrated (Valenti, Dale, How, de Farias, & Vian, : 24 hr single‐vehicle experiment) and (Mulgaonkar & Kumar, : 9.5 hr with multiple vehicles). Recharging methods vary from wireless charging (Aldhaher, Mitcheson, Arteaga, Kkelis, & Yates, ) to contact‐based charging pads (Mulgaonkar & Kumar, ) to battery swap systems (Toksoz et al, ; Suzuki, Filho, & Morrison, ). While wireless charging offers the most flexibility since no physical contact has to be made, charging currents are low resulting in excessively long charging times and are hence not an option for quick redeployment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2]: 9.5 h with multiple vehicles). Recharging methods vary from wireless charging [3] to contact-based charging pads [2] to battery swap systems [4] [5]. While wireless charging offers the most flexibility since no physical contact has to be made, charging currents are low resulting in excessively long charging times and are hence not an option for quick redeployment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%