2022
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/17/08/p08014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light yield non-proportionality of inorganic crystals and its effect on cosmic-ray measurements

Abstract: The multi-TeV energy region of the cosmic-ray spectra has been recently explored by direct detection experiments that used calorimetric techniques to measure the energy of the cosmic particles. Interesting spectral features have been observed in both all-electron and nuclei spectra. However, the interpretation of the results is compromised by the disagreements between the data obtained from the various experiments, that are not reconcilable with the quoted experimental uncertainties. Understan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At high ionization densities, that is, high linear energy transfer (LET), the luminescent response of scintillators is known to experience quenching, which is the underlying cause of non‐proportionality effects in scintillators 33 . In the case of organic scintillators, this quenching behavior can be modeled by the empirical Birks' law, stating that normaldLnormaldxdEdx1+BnormaldEnormaldx0.33em,$$\begin{equation} \frac{\mathrm{d}L}{\mathrm{d}x} \propto \frac{\frac{\mathrm{d}E}{\mathrm{d}x}}{1+B\frac{\mathrm{d}E}{\mathrm{d}x}}\ , \end{equation}$$where dLdx$\frac{\mathrm{d}L}{\mathrm{d}x}$ is the differential light yield, dEdx$\frac{\mathrm{d}E}{\mathrm{d}x}$ is the ionization density (deposited energy per step length from simulations), and B$B$ is the Birks coefficient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At high ionization densities, that is, high linear energy transfer (LET), the luminescent response of scintillators is known to experience quenching, which is the underlying cause of non‐proportionality effects in scintillators 33 . In the case of organic scintillators, this quenching behavior can be modeled by the empirical Birks' law, stating that normaldLnormaldxdEdx1+BnormaldEnormaldx0.33em,$$\begin{equation} \frac{\mathrm{d}L}{\mathrm{d}x} \propto \frac{\frac{\mathrm{d}E}{\mathrm{d}x}}{1+B\frac{\mathrm{d}E}{\mathrm{d}x}}\ , \end{equation}$$where dLdx$\frac{\mathrm{d}L}{\mathrm{d}x}$ is the differential light yield, dEdx$\frac{\mathrm{d}E}{\mathrm{d}x}$ is the ionization density (deposited energy per step length from simulations), and B$B$ is the Birks coefficient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At high ionization densities, that is, high linear energy transfer (LET), the luminescent response of scintillators is known to experience quenching, which is the underlying cause of non-proportionality effects in scintillators. 33 In the case of organic scintillators, this quenching behavior can be modeled by the empirical Birks' law, stating that…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurements of the hadronic intensities are however not necessarily consistent between different experiments. The most commonly cited reason for this is uncertainties in the (relative) energy scale calibrations of different experiments, in particular for indirect observations such as those by IceTop and KASCADE, but also for calorimetric experiments such as DAMPE (Adriani et al 2022a). We here follow Dembinski et al (2017) in introducing one nuisance parameter α k per experiment k in order to rescale the experimental intensities.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As summarized in Tab.1, the HERD experiment is designed to reach 𝐺 𝑒 𝑓 𝑓 higher than 2 𝑚 2 𝑠𝑟 for e − + e + and 1 𝑚 2 𝑠𝑟 for p and nuclei, and 𝜎 𝐸 /𝐸 better than 2% for e − + e + and 30% for p and nuclei. This is possible thanks to an innovative geometry based on a homogeneous, isotropic and finely-segmented 3D calorimeter, as demonstrated by the Calocube collaboration [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Detector Designmentioning
confidence: 99%