2021
DOI: 10.1109/tnse.2021.3069128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LightLedger: A Novel Blockchain-Based Domain Certificate Authentication and Validation Scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid single point of failure, multiple CAs issue certificates and record certificate transactions on the blockchain through smart contracts. In the work of Garba et al [18], a blockchain-based cross-domain authentication scheme was proposed. It has privacy-preserving features for lowperformance devices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid single point of failure, multiple CAs issue certificates and record certificate transactions on the blockchain through smart contracts. In the work of Garba et al [18], a blockchain-based cross-domain authentication scheme was proposed. It has privacy-preserving features for lowperformance devices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the proposed TCBSOA outperformed all other prevailing methodologies. Proposed model 1987 (Rafique et al, 2021) 2589 (Sasikumar et al, 2022) (Liu et al, 2021) 3996 (Garba et al, 2021) 4872…”
Section: Performance Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the system consumed more time for the testing process. (Garba et al, 2021) examined a framework called BC-centered domain name authentication system and certificate authentication. The system involved a set of trusted Certificate Authorities (CAs) who were related to an exact domain in the BC.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several alternative revocation status protocols have been developed [5], [6], [39], [45], as well as novel PKIs [3], [24], [47], [48], [52]; however, all of these protocols and PKIs require large changes to the infrastructure. Similarly, many other semi-centralized and decentralized PKIs, revocation protocols and logs have been proposed [7], [16], [17], [25], [28], [32], [44], [46], [50]. Matsumoto et al [36] propose a decentralized framework that incentivizes CAs to monitor for certificate misissuance through financial penalties.…”
Section: B Revocation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%