2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightning data assimilation in the WRF-ARW model for short-term rainfall forecasts of three severe storm cases in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the aim of the paper is to show the impact of LDA over the sea, the forecast was also verified over land with the IMERG dataset. Results show a positive impact of LDA over the Italian peninsula, in agreement with the results already found by the same authors in past studies with WRF and RAMS@ISAC numerical weather prediction models [8,30,55].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While the aim of the paper is to show the impact of LDA over the sea, the forecast was also verified over land with the IMERG dataset. Results show a positive impact of LDA over the Italian peninsula, in agreement with the results already found by the same authors in past studies with WRF and RAMS@ISAC numerical weather prediction models [8,30,55].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The idea behind this setting is to maximize the impact of LDA on the forecast. Comellas Prat et al [30], using a similar WRF setting, showed that choosing A = 0.85 (B = 0.17, i.e., A + B = 1.02) resulted in worse performance compared to A = 0.95 (B = 0.07), the latter giving more weight to LDA. We performed similar tests for some cases of November 2019 (not shown), and the results reveal that A = 0.95 (B = 0.0.7) gives a better precipitation forecast compared to A = 0.85 (B = 0.17).…”
Section: Model Setup and Lightning Data Assimilation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations