2021
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10507768.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightning Interferometric Processing and Uncertainty Analysis for General Noncoplanar Antenna Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although only the errors caused by the assumption of plane wave during CINTF positioning were considered when calibrating the positioning results, existing research have verified the accuracy of the CINTF used in this study [14,16]. Recently, Shao et al [32] analyzed the uncertainty of general noncoplanar antenna arrays and discussed the effect of antenna layout, radiation source location, and time error on accuracy. In the future, we will further analyze the impact of these factors on the positioning of CINTF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Although only the errors caused by the assumption of plane wave during CINTF positioning were considered when calibrating the positioning results, existing research have verified the accuracy of the CINTF used in this study [14,16]. Recently, Shao et al [32] analyzed the uncertainty of general noncoplanar antenna arrays and discussed the effect of antenna layout, radiation source location, and time error on accuracy. In the future, we will further analyze the impact of these factors on the positioning of CINTF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The second situation is using only two baselines produced by four non-coplanar antennas to solve Equation 7. If we have only two non-coplanar baselines, we can substitute Equation 2 into Equation 7 to get the analytical expression, as done by Shao et al (2021Shao et al ( , 2023. Here we provided another solution, which is more flexible for baseline quantities.…”
Section: Methods 2: Coordinate Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method proposed by Shao et al (2021Shao et al ( , 2023 can be a subset of Method 2 if we calculate using two non-coplanar baselines each time. Here, we prefer to take the weighted average of different three-antenna combinations to save calculation time.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis has some similarities to the work of Refs. [27,28], but it includes many more (close to 400, instead of 3) antennas with baselines of up to 100 km. Since we include many more antennas the analysis is not based on the calculation of cross correlations between the antenna pairs but beamforming and an analytic calculation of error is thus precluded.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VHF radiation is not obscured by the presence of clouds and is not attenuated in the atmosphere thus allowing for large distance observations. Radio imaging of lightning is routinely done using lightning mapping arrays [8,9] with a temporal resolution of tens of microseconds, and has recently gone through major developments with the introduction of VHF radio interferometers [10][11][12][13][14], culminating in the precision observations using the LOFAR radio telescope [15] operating in the 30-80 MHz band [16,17]. The main strength of LOFAR for lightning imaging lies in the combination of a large number of antennas (about 200 are customarily used out of about 3000 available), large baselines (up to 100 km), high timing stability (better than 10 −9 s=s), low noise level, polarization sensitivity, and the possibility for off-line analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%