2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightning strike damage detection at a fastener using self-sensing TDR of composite plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date test standards representing the features of real world lightning events have been developed and are used to ensure that lightning protection systems can safely shield the underlying composite materials during the service life of an aircraft [8][9][10][11]. Variants of such test procedures have also been used to understand how the design parameters of a composite material and the parameters of the test arrangement influence the scale and form of material damage with and without protection systems [3][4][5][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, due to the experimental challenges associated with lightning strike testing (the high energy involved, the short duration of the event, the limited number of facilities and resulting cost and waiting time [26]) a body of computational research has also evolved which attempts to model the standard tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date test standards representing the features of real world lightning events have been developed and are used to ensure that lightning protection systems can safely shield the underlying composite materials during the service life of an aircraft [8][9][10][11]. Variants of such test procedures have also been used to understand how the design parameters of a composite material and the parameters of the test arrangement influence the scale and form of material damage with and without protection systems [3][4][5][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, due to the experimental challenges associated with lightning strike testing (the high energy involved, the short duration of the event, the limited number of facilities and resulting cost and waiting time [26]) a body of computational research has also evolved which attempts to model the standard tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and 3). Both numerical and experimental studies of CFRP structures subjected to lightning strikes [12][13][14][15][16] proved that lightning still causes serious damage in such structures which extent dramatically increases when discharging occurs near metallic fasteners. In order to improve electrical conductivity of these materials various solutions of LSP of aircraft have been developed to-date.…”
Section: Overview On Lightning Strike Protection Solutions In Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any variation of the electromagnetic (EM) properties can be revealed in the signals received. For composites, microwave testing methods have been developed for monitoring automated tape laying (ATL) processes (62) , detection of impact damage (63)(64)(65) , delamination (66)(67)(68) , air voids (69) , lightning strike damage (70,71) and moisture ingress in sandwich structures (72,73) . Compared with the other NDT methods, microwave testing has the advantages of being non-contact, no need for surface transducers, couplants or complicated signal post-processing, it is operator friendly, relatively inexpensive and has no ionising hazards (74)(75)(76)(77) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%