“…In terms of efficiency, the proposed ECSM design is better than all the discussed designs as evident by the figure. To be precise, it has 2.3 , 1.7 , 2.5 , 13.3 , 3.2 , 4.5 , 6.9 , 5.3 , 3.1 , 2.5 , 3.3 , 3 , and 2.94 higher efficiency as compared to previous works, 23–26,28–35,54 respectively. Note that only Awaludin et al 27 is the only design with similar efficiency and NATP values; however, it heavily relies on DSP blocks and BRAMs.…”