2006 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing 2006
DOI: 10.1109/clustr.2006.311853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightweight I/O for Scientific Applications

Abstract: Today's high-end massively parallel processing (MPP) machines have thousands to tens of thousands of processors, with next-generation systems planned to have in excess of one hundred thousand processors. For systems of such scale, efficient I/O is a significant challenge that cannot be solved using traditional approaches. In particular, general purpose parallel file systems that limit applications to standard interfaces and access policies do not scale and will likely be a performance bottleneck for many scien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, those semantics are not always required for storage operations. By removing all but the most essential services, a custom file system can give excellent performance since it does not pay the performance penalties of any services that are not required [26]. While this works well, it would still require customizations similar to the proposed work so that it can adapt to different application requirements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, those semantics are not always required for storage operations. By removing all but the most essential services, a custom file system can give excellent performance since it does not pay the performance penalties of any services that are not required [26]. While this works well, it would still require customizations similar to the proposed work so that it can adapt to different application requirements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Lightweight File Systems [26] project at Sandia Labs has stripped down POSIX semantics to a core of authentication and authorization affording layering of other semantics, like consistency, on an as-needed basis. Other file systems like the Serverless File System [3] have distributed metadata weakening the immediate consistency across the entire network of machines.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, such server-directed I/O [7] leaves much more room for optimisation. For example, we let the HSM system reorder the files in the staging list such that files close to one another on the same tape volume will be staged together, reducing many random seeks into fewer sequential reads.…”
Section: Access Intervals (Days)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I/O forwarding has also been used in Prost et al (2001), Oldfield et al (2006), Nisar et al (2008), Fu et al (2010), Docan et al (2010) and May (2001) to reduce the I/O impact on computing. The IBM Blue Gene series of supercomputers (Yu et al, 2006) uses independent I/O nodes in their system to handle I/O requests, which are generated in computer nodes and forwarded to I/O nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%