2021
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202100183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightweight Low‐Frequency Sound‐Absorbing Composites of Graphene Network Reinforced by Honeycomb Structure

Abstract: Efficient, facile, lightweight, and low‐frequency sound‐absorbing materials are in great demand for noise elimination and insulation. However, the applications of some candidate materials are limited by their large space, mass, or unsatisfactory sound‐absorption performance especially in low‐frequency sound‐wave region. Graphene network structure can be promising sound‐absorbing materials due to ultrahigh porosity, ultralight weight, and excellent intrinsic properties. Conventionally, allowing for poor mechani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2022, 34, 2103740 same thickness (Figure S18A, Supporting Information). Moreover, the specific NRC and greater efficiency of PFGA surpassed most of the reported sound-absorption materials, such as the conventional porous materials, [29,30,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42] composites [21,22,25,[43][44][45][46][47] and ultralight aerogels [35,[48][49][50] (Figure 4E and Figure S18B, Supporting Information), in which air friction mechanism dominates. The superiority of PFGA in sound absorption is ascribed to the strong resonance of ultrathin graphene drums, fulfilling the overwhelming merit of graphene sheets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2022, 34, 2103740 same thickness (Figure S18A, Supporting Information). Moreover, the specific NRC and greater efficiency of PFGA surpassed most of the reported sound-absorption materials, such as the conventional porous materials, [29,30,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42] composites [21,22,25,[43][44][45][46][47] and ultralight aerogels [35,[48][49][50] (Figure 4E and Figure S18B, Supporting Information), in which air friction mechanism dominates. The superiority of PFGA in sound absorption is ascribed to the strong resonance of ultrathin graphene drums, fulfilling the overwhelming merit of graphene sheets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 219 , 220 , 221 ] Excitingly, the honeycomb architecture has excellent properties such as lightweight, high strength, sound, and thermal insulation. [ 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 ] These properties have attracted widespread interest from structural and materials scientists and have led to a wide range of applications for the honeycomb architecture. Furthermore, honeycomb architectures have also been found in the wood of bamboo and spruce, which demonstrates that nature is an excellent structural scientist.…”
Section: Honeycomb Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, foam-based sound absorption materials have the advantages of being lightweight and having great structural stability [19][20][21]. Currently, foam-based sound absorption materials mainly include metal foams, inorganic foams, polymer foams and their composite foams [22][23][24][25], which dissipate the sound wave energy through resonance and multiple re ections within the materials to achieve the noise mitigation effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%