2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2006.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Likelihood and pseudo-likelihood methods for semiparametric joint models for a primary endpoint and longitudinal data

Abstract: Inference on the association between a primary endpoint and features of longitudinal profiles of a continuous response is of central interest in medical and public health research. Joint models that represent the association through shared dependence of the primary and longitudinal data on random effects are increasingly popular; however, existing inferential methods may be inefficient or sensitive to assumptions on the random effects distribution. We consider a semiparametric joint model that makes only mild … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…#Below (theta [1],theta [2],theta [3],theta [4]) ¼ # (log(C1),C2,log(sigma2u)) auu < -1/sigma2u sigma2u < -exp(theta [4] [1],-nu-i)) * (mus [2] * pow(lambdas [2],-nu-i)) * (mus [3] * pow(lambdas [3],-nu-i)) * (mus [4] * pow(lambdas [4],-nu-i)) v2[i] < -(pow(exp(loggam(nuþi)),3) * exp(loggam(nu)) * exp(logfact(i))) v3[i] < -exp((nuþi) * (mus [ [4])))}…”
Section: Association Between Hba1c and Obstetric Labor Complication Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…#Below (theta [1],theta [2],theta [3],theta [4]) ¼ # (log(C1),C2,log(sigma2u)) auu < -1/sigma2u sigma2u < -exp(theta [4] [1],-nu-i)) * (mus [2] * pow(lambdas [2],-nu-i)) * (mus [3] * pow(lambdas [3],-nu-i)) * (mus [4] * pow(lambdas [4],-nu-i)) v2[i] < -(pow(exp(loggam(nuþi)),3) * exp(loggam(nu)) * exp(logfact(i))) v3[i] < -exp((nuþi) * (mus [ [4])))}…”
Section: Association Between Hba1c and Obstetric Labor Complication Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1]*theta[1] þ mus[2]*theta[2] þ mus[3]*theta[3] þ mus[4]*theta[4]) -((1/lambdas[1]) * exp(mus[1]*theta[1]) þ (1/lambdas[2]) * exp(mus[2]*theta[2]) þ (1/lambdas[3]) * exp(mus[3]*theta[3]) þ (1/lambdas[4]) * exp(mus[4]*theta…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1f implies the two random effects covariates X i 1 and X i 2 are correlated. To check if Gaussian distribution is a realistic assumption for the random effects , we estimated the joint density of X i 1 and X i 2 by the approach of Li, Zhang, and Davidian (2007), which chooses the random effects density via standard model selection criteria. Since all criteria selected Gaussian distribution, we assumed .…”
Section: Obesity Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimating equation strategy was extended by Li et al (2007a) to a model with multiple longitudinal covariates. Li et al (2007b) proposed a semiparametric version of the joint model in which normality of the random effects was not assumed, and then suggested using an EM algorithm or two-stage pseudo-likelihood approach to estimate the parameters in the model. Recently, Hwang et al (2011) extended the EM algorithm approach developed by Wulfsohn and Tsiatis (1997) to the context of a logistic regression submodel for the response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%