2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00034-008-9063-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Likelihood-Based Demodulation in Multi-User Chaos Shift Keying Communication

Abstract: This paper deals with the theory of multi-user chaos shift keying communication systems in the coherent case and in particular with bit error performance under near optimal demodulation. The new approximated likelihood and near optimal demodulator is based on the statistical likelihood of the received signal and is a theoretical generalization of the conventional correlation demodulator involving autocorrelations of the spreading. Near optimal theoretical results beginning from an exact analysis are derived fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier approaches, see [2], much advanced the topic by giving simple Gaussian approximation (SGA) to the distribution. But to improve on this, Lawrance [13], [6], introduced the conditional Gaussian approximation (CGA). This gave two useful equivalent expressions of the result as…”
Section: Recent Results For Coherent Csk Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier approaches, see [2], much advanced the topic by giving simple Gaussian approximation (SGA) to the distribution. But to improve on this, Lawrance [13], [6], introduced the conditional Gaussian approximation (CGA). This gave two useful equivalent expressions of the result as…”
Section: Recent Results For Coherent Csk Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has also been criticism that the bit error performance of chaos-based systems is often inferior to that conventional sinusoidal systems. This point may be lessened by optimized coding and decoding which means not following the conventional approaches, but using statistically efficient ones, Lawrance [6]. Alternatively, as first pointed out by Kolumban [7] and continued by Kolumban [8] and Wang [9] in this session, the applications should be ones where the perceived criticisms are irrelevant, such as ultra wide-band radio, low data rate personal networks and optical laser systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, in [19] the likelihood was approximated by a multivariate Gaussian distribution and this led to a generalized correlation decoder which took the form l x This decoder is thus seen to take account of autocorrelation within the spreading, and to be the same as the correlation decoder if there is no autocorrelation within the spreading. The exact theory for its BER follows similarly to that of the correlation decoder at (38) and (39), and the result from [19] is ( )…”
Section: Single-user Exact Gaussian Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are illustrated by Figure 2 in that logistic spreading with its zero quadratic autocorrelations is better than Bernoulli-shift spreading with its geometric one-quarter quadratic autocorrelations. The corresponding SGA for the non-optimum correlation decoding in non-coherent CSK is Both (12) and (13) give statistical structure and simplicity to the computational results in Lau and Tse, 2003[9]; the additional terms in (13) indicate the loss in performance due the transmission of reference segments in place of their exact replication at the receiver. An exact BER result for correlation decoding in single-user non-coherent CSK is given in Lawrance and Ohama, 2003 [11] in terms of non-central F-distributions, and optimal likelihood-based decoding is has been developed by T. Papamarkou, Chaos, 2009 [1].…”
Section: Single-user Csk: Exact and Approximate Bit Error Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A correlation decoder could still be used but would not be as good in BER terms as a likelihood-based decoder, as will be seen. The likelihood decoder of the multi-user CSK system requires a careful analysis which significantly departs from that of the single-user case, Lawrance and Yao, 2008 [13], and leads to the generalized correlation decoder…”
Section: Multi-user Csk: Coherent and Non-coherentmentioning
confidence: 99%