2007
DOI: 10.1080/03610920601126241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Likelihood-Based Inference for Multivariate Skew-Normal Regression Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
51
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…, σ 2 e i ) and Z ∼ SN p (μ, , λ) denotes a p-variate skew-normal random vector with location vector μ, scale matrix and skewness parameter vector λ. For further details see [23]. From Proposition 6 in [7], it can be shown that ζ ij and x ij are independent with…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, σ 2 e i ) and Z ∼ SN p (μ, , λ) denotes a p-variate skew-normal random vector with location vector μ, scale matrix and skewness parameter vector λ. For further details see [23]. From Proposition 6 in [7], it can be shown that ζ ij and x ij are independent with…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If λ x = 0, then the asymmetric model reduces to the N-NIMEM. From the marginal stochastic representation of an SN random vector (see [23]), it follows that the regression set up defined in Equations (2), (3) can be written hierarchically as…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This class is a modified version of the multivariate skew-normal distribution, proposed by Azzalini and Dalla-Valle (1996). This form is more applicable in linear model context, for example Arellano-Valle et al (2005a) and Lachos et al (2007), respectively, had used it for analyzing skewnormal linear mixed model and multivariate skew-normal regression models. Also, Lin and Lee (2008) used this version for estimation and prediction in linear mixed models with skew-normal random effects for longitudinal data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Table 8, it is observed that the estimates differ slightly between the two models. Following Lachos et al [34], we propose selecting the best fit between N-LRM and SP-LRM by inspection of information criteria such as AIC and BIC (the preferred model is the one with the smallest value of the criterion). The AIC and BIC values shown at the bottom of Table 8 indicate that the SP-LRM outperforms the N-LRM.…”
Section: Application Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%