2003
DOI: 10.1201/9780203494462.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Likelihood Methods for Neural Spike Train Data Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
188
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
188
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To simplify model estimation, we further assumed the multiplicative form of the conditional intensity function (t͉H t ) ϭ 1 (t) ⅐ 2 (). In the multiplicative IMI process, the first component 1 (t) describes the time-dependent modulation of the spiking activity of the neuron reflecting its responsiveness to different stimuli (Berry and Meister, 1998;Brown et al, 2003;Schaette et al, 2005). The second component 2 (), which might be called "postimpulse probability" following Poggio and Viernstein (1964), reflects the membrane properties of the neuron including its refractory periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simplify model estimation, we further assumed the multiplicative form of the conditional intensity function (t͉H t ) ϭ 1 (t) ⅐ 2 (). In the multiplicative IMI process, the first component 1 (t) describes the time-dependent modulation of the spiking activity of the neuron reflecting its responsiveness to different stimuli (Berry and Meister, 1998;Brown et al, 2003;Schaette et al, 2005). The second component 2 (), which might be called "postimpulse probability" following Poggio and Viernstein (1964), reflects the membrane properties of the neuron including its refractory periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there is significant overlap between adjacent local likelihood intervals, we start the Newton-Raphson procedure at t with the previous local maximum-likelihood estimate at time t − . Model goodness-of-fit is based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test and associated KS statistics [23,28], along with autocorrelation plots testing the independence of the model-transformed intervals [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Equation (6), both the factors λ S (x(t)) and r(t − s * ) are dynamic, evolving simultaneously according to a state-space model specified by a point process adaptive filter Brown et al, 2003). This allowed the authors to describe the way the receptive fields evolve across space and time.…”
Section: Tracking Plasticity In Hippocampal Place Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point-process likelihood function is then given by the simple and explicit pdf (Snyder and Miller, 1991;Brown et al, 2003;Paninski, 2004;Truccolo et al, 2005) …”
Section: Approximating the If Model Via Simpler Point-process Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%