2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rard.2016.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Likelihood ratio (razón de verosimilitud): definición y aplicación en Radiología

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of values and their impact on the clinical utility are: LR+: > 10 great increase, excellent test; 5–10 moderate increase, good test; 2–5: small increase, bad test; <2: minor increase, useless test. LR−: 0.5–1 minor decrease, useless test; 0.2–0.5 small decrease, bad test; 0.1–0.2 moderate decrease, good test; <0.1 great decrease, excellent test [ 3 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. The confidence interval for all of them was 95%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of values and their impact on the clinical utility are: LR+: > 10 great increase, excellent test; 5–10 moderate increase, good test; 2–5: small increase, bad test; <2: minor increase, useless test. LR−: 0.5–1 minor decrease, useless test; 0.2–0.5 small decrease, bad test; 0.1–0.2 moderate decrease, good test; <0.1 great decrease, excellent test [ 3 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. The confidence interval for all of them was 95%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por el contrario, LR < 1 disminuyen la probabilidad de que el trastorno esté presente, a menor el LR, mayor es la disminución de la probabilidad. En este caso, aunque los valores de LR hallados por sí solo parecen indicar cambios modestos en la probabilidad posprueba, su contribución a la práctica clínica puede ser importante si se la utiliza en forma combinada con una correcta valoración clínica, incluyendo evaluación de factores de riesgo y examen clínico (29) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…By risk estimators, it is possible to know the aspects related to the incidence that lead to the evaluation of the clinical relevance in the mentioned event [23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%