Lille, de la métropole à la région urbaine

Paris, Didier

doi:10.3406/mappe.2002.1757

Cited by 14 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the basis of a tenyear research program (POPSU1; POPSU 2) [2], Liefooghe et al (2017) provided an initial outline of this IES, characterizing the emergence of the ecosystem and identifying its pivotal actor (Euratechnologies) as well as other core actors. This ecosystem emerged from public and private initiatives engaged in a strategy to reverse the declining regional dynamic towards new industrial specializations (Paris and Stevens, 2000). Euratechnologies was created (2006) to orchestrate relationships between actors in the ICT and digital sector and to promote the development of startups.…”

Section: Ict and The Digital Innovation Ecosystem In Hauts-de-francementioning

confidence: 99%

Providers or users of Industry 4.0-based solutions: how does the innovation ecosystem affect a company’s decision to engage in Industry 4.0?

Boyer,

Kokosy

2024

JMTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeCompany goals, behaviors and decision-making processes may differ depending on whether a given company decides to engage in the Industry 4.0 (I4.0) paradigm as a user or as a provider of I4.0-based solutions. This paper will consider this question in-depth by focusing on the extent to which the innovation ecosystem (IES) affects these two main strategies.Design/methodology/approachThe authors' study aims to analyze the impact of a regional information and communication technology (ICT) ecosystem on the implementation of I4.0 at the company level by using an original survey of 123 companies that are already engaged in the implementation of I4.0 in the French region of Hauts-de-France and by employing two sets of logit models.FindingsThe authors' empirical study demonstrates the importance of an innovation ecosystem-based strategy for I4.0 technology provision. It reveals that engaging in R&D collaborative projects and developing links and complex relationships with heterogeneous actors within the IES positively affects the likelihood of a given firm deciding to implement I4.0 as a provider of I4.0-based solutions. This does not, however, affect the probability of a firm engaging in the I4.0 paradigm as a user of technologies and solutions.Practical implicationsFrom a policy standpoint, this study could encourage decision-makers to engage with I4.0 development by developing policies targeting the reinforcement of IES at a regional level. This could also help to accelerate the adoption of I4.0 technologies by manufacturing companies and foster the development of I4.0-based solutions through specific company-targeted policies. The authors' study supports the need for manufacturing company managers to evaluate and identify the best technological strategies related to the I4.0 paradigm that meet their specific needs.Originality/valueThe authors' study shows that the decision to engage in the I4.0 paradigm as providers of I4.0-based solutions is more likely to rely on an innovation ecosystem-based strategy, while the decision to engage in the I4.0 paradigm as users of I4.0-based solutions is more likely to rely on the company’s internal strategies, resources and demand-side benefits.

show abstract

Section: Ict and The Digital Innovation Ecosystem In Hauts-de-francementioning

confidence: 99%

Providers or users of Industry 4.0-based solutions: how does the innovation ecosystem affect a company’s decision to engage in Industry 4.0?

Boyer,

Kokosy

2024

JMTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cross-border cooperation on the British-Franco-Belgian border has been studied in geographic monographs (Hamez, 2004;Perrin, 2013;Verger, 2011) and in numerous articles (Church & Reid, 1999;Duhamel & Renard, 2002Durand, 2013;Durand & Nelles, 2014;Durand & Perrin, 2017;Heddebaut, 2004;Leloup, 2010;Maneveau, 2008;Paris, 2002;Perrin, 2012). At first sight, the British-Franco-Belgian border consists of two urban cross-border regions: the one around Lille, and the other one on the Franco-Belgian coastline.…”

Section: Multiplication: Political Construction Processes At the Brit...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A collection of academic publications applies a complementary analytical approach to individual case studies, sometimes with a thematic focus. The spatial structure of the cross-border region around Lille has for instance been studied in terms of a metropolitan approach (Paris, 2002), through cross-border flows of residents (Clément, 2015), and of workers or consumers (Letniowska-Swiat, 2002), through the question of the integration process (Durand & Perrin, 2017), or through projects of urban planning (Reitel & Moullé, 2015). Additionally, the local urban planning agency published an impressive Atlas of the cross-border Metropolitan Area of Lille (ADULM, MBM & INSEE NPdC, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatial evolution of cross-border regions. Contrasted case studies in North-West Europe

Pupier

2019

European Planning Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The building process of cross-border territories in the EU is addressed in this paper with a geographical and political approach. The spatial evolution of institutionalized cross-border cooperation is investigated comparatively on two borders: the Cross-Channel Euroregion between France, Belgium and the United Kingdom, and the Upper Rhine region between France, Germany and Switzerland. Data collection on these case studies categorize the spatialization of cross-border cooperation. The links between the set of partners and the perimeter raise questions about the territorialisation process. The emergence, adjustments and even the disappearance of cross-border regions are examined, leading to a new quantitative and qualitative understanding of the spatial evolution of crossborder regions. Phenomena of juxtaposition and scaling fuel the multiplication of cross-border regions, while processes of shrinkage or disappearance are the exception. Adjustments of the cross-border perimeter are primarily due to enlargement, expansion and fusion. A few cross-border cooperation initiatives are developing a new relationship to their cross-border region, distinguishing the institutional perimeter of the partnership from the functional perimeter of projects.In an uncertain European context, cross-border regions tend to multiply and extend. Showing similarities with 'soft spaces', they prove themselves to be very adaptable in their spatial (re-)definition.

show abstract

Culture in the city, culture for the city? The political construction of the trickle-down in cultural regeneration strategies in Roubaix, France

Colomb

2011

Town Planning Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lille, de la métropole à la région urbaine

Cited by 14 publications

References 0 publications

Providers or users of Industry 4.0-based solutions: how does the innovation ecosystem affect a company’s decision to engage in Industry 4.0?

Providers or users of Industry 4.0-based solutions: how does the innovation ecosystem affect a company’s decision to engage in Industry 4.0?

Spatial evolution of cross-border regions. Contrasted case studies in North-West Europe

Culture in the city, culture for the city? The political construction of the trickle-down in cultural regeneration strategies in Roubaix, France

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About