Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH: Principles and Management 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0221-6_77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limestone efficiency and boron effects on forage yield and soil properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Haby et al (17) reported that increasing the limestone fineness to 100% effective calcium carbonate equivalence (ECCE) doubled extractable Ca, increased Mg and P, and lowered the level of hot water-soluble B compared to 62% ECCE limestone applied to a Darco soil (loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Grossarenic Paleudult). Only a small percentage of the adsorbed B was retained by the soil against leaching with water at pH 5.8, but as soil pH was increased, the amount of B retained against leaching increased (17). From 1 to 3 kg B ha 21 are generally recommended for alfalfa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Haby et al (17) reported that increasing the limestone fineness to 100% effective calcium carbonate equivalence (ECCE) doubled extractable Ca, increased Mg and P, and lowered the level of hot water-soluble B compared to 62% ECCE limestone applied to a Darco soil (loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Grossarenic Paleudult). Only a small percentage of the adsorbed B was retained by the soil against leaching with water at pH 5.8, but as soil pH was increased, the amount of B retained against leaching increased (17). From 1 to 3 kg B ha 21 are generally recommended for alfalfa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Limestone application significantly increased soil pH from 5.3 in 1985 to 6.1 in 2004 for all treatments (Silveira et al, 2006). A soil pH of 6.0 to 6.2 is considered adequate for cool‐season forage growth (Haby et al, 1995; Haby and Leonard, 2002). Clover is especially sensitive to low pH and may not perform satisfactorily in acidic soils (Blue and Carlisle, 1985).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an acidic material, such as the pyrite-bearing rock piles at the Questa mine, paste pH is an approximate measurement of the acidity of a soil material that is produced by the oxidation of pyrite and other sulfides at the time of measurement. Six common variables that affect the measurement of paste pH and conductivity are 1) the dryness of the sample before testing, 2) the soil:water ratio used, 3) soluble salts content, 4) seasonally influenced carbon-dioxide content, 5) the size of the soil particles, and 6) electrode junction potential (Price et al, 1997;Haby et al, 1997). Many of these can be controlled by applying rigorous testing procedures and the same equipment for the measurements.…”
Section: Paste Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%