Limestone Provenance in Roman Lime‐Volcanic Ash Mortars from the Villa dei Quintili, Rome

Abstract

Roman mortars were collected from the Villa dei Quintili in Rome, an archaeological site consisting of numerous edifices from nine construction phases dating from the 2nd century A.D. to modern times. A multianalytical approach was used on 34 mortar samples to infer the evolution of production techniques over time and to identify the source area of calcareous raw materials used in the preparation of the lime. Optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy coupled with an energy-dispersive system, and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry were used to study the samples. The major and trace element data were compared with the compositions of two types of limestone samples (Calcare Massiccio and Calcare Maiolica) collected from the Cornicolani Mountains. The results suggest that the technological practices and the calcareous raw materials used for lime production remained unchanged over the time period considered (2nd century A.D. to 3rd century A.D.). The compositions of lime-related particles in the mortars match those of Calcare Maiolica, which suggests its use as raw material for lime production. On the whole, the results are in agreement with data from existing literature regarding both the use by Roman builders of specific raw materials for the mortars' production and the relative supply area. C 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Characterization of rammed‐earth materials from the XVIth century Badii Palace in Marrakech, Morocco to ensure authentic and reliable restoration

“…The only drawback of these constructions is the limited durability of the material against the aggressive action exerted by external agents (rain, capillary rise, erosion due to anthropogenic action) that makes it necessary for constant maintenance (Avrami, Guillaud, & Hardy, 2008;Guettala, Abibsi, & Houari, 2006;Love, 2012). The choice of suitable materials for maintenance and conservation should be based on the knowledge gained from study of the traditional building techniques together with new experimentation (Fichera et al, 2015;Goodman-Elgar, Bettencourt, & Conrey, 2015).…”

Petrographic Markers for Archaeometric Identification of Montjuïc Sandstone, the Flagship Stone of Barcelona (NE Spain)

“…To undertake archaeometric provenance studies of stone materials, the chemical approach (often based on trace element analyses) is the common choice for small objects made of gemstones consisting of one or few minerals [9][10][11] and for objects made of volcanic rocks with vitreous or microcrystalline components [12][13][14]. Regarding other stones and uses, the usual approach is a standard petrographic characterization [6] often combined with X-ray diffraction and/or chemical analyses [15][16][17]. For white marbles, a multitechnique approach has been developed including petrography, chemical analyses, cathodoluminescence, and particularly stable isotopes [18][19][20][21].…”

Indirect chronology method employing rare earth elements to identify Sagunto Castle mortar construction periods

“…Innovative methodological approaches employing REE have been recently established to tackle challenging archaeological problems related to the polished stone raw material origins [23] and soil formations [24,25]. REE and other trace elements analysis have been used by some authors to identify mortar raw materials [2,3,26,27,28]. For example, studies of REE in mortar samples were carried out by Mirello et al [27] employing La/Ce ratio, to identify the provenance of limestone employed to made the mortars at the Aztec Sacred Precinct of Tenochtitlan (Mexico City).…”