Liminality, space and the importance of ‘transitory dwelling places’ at work

Abstract

This article draws attention to the spaces in-between and employees’ lived experiences of liminal spaces at work. It illustrates how and why liminal spaces are used and made meaningful by workers, in contrast to the dominant spaces that surround them. Consequently, the article extends the concept of liminality and argues that when liminal spaces are constructed, by workers, as vital and meaningful to their everyday lives they cease to be liminal spaces and instead become ‘transitory dwelling places’. In order to examine this shift from ambiguous space to meaningful place, the works of Casey (1993), amongst others, are used to make further sense of the space/materiality/work nexus in organizational life. This article is based on empirical data gathered from a nine-month study of hairdressers working in hair salons and explores the function and meaning of liminal spaces used by hairdressers in their everyday lives. The contribution of this article is three-fold; it argues that space is not just about dominant spaces; it extends the concept of liminality; and in connection with the latter, it demonstrates how transitory dwelling places offer fertile ground in which we might further develop our knowledge of the lived experiences of space at work.

Organizing Solidarity Initiatives: A Socio-spatial Conceptualization of Resistance

“…Yet, resisting places are not only actual, existing settings (Courpasson et al, 2017) or 'transitory dwelling places' (Shortt, 2015), but also 'autonomous, borderless spaces' generated by various intensities and flows (Hardt & Negri, 2001). These flows enact resistances that 'run along dispersed, centripetal lines' (Hardy, 2016, p.104), and become something 'other' than a direct opposition or confrontation.…”

“From Tangible Space to Intangible Space“ Kanoman Palace and Kacirebonan Palace

“…This condition indicates that space or place connotes to the deepest part of the human soul. It is therefore not surprising that the last two decades of space research and its relation to social behavior are still of interest (Short, 2015). These elements are intangible space.…”

“…Physical space or called the tangible space are spaces that can be physically captured by the senses while non-physical or intangible space is a space that is not caught by the five senses. Anthropological research argues that the first 'double built' space is a physical building and the second is a result of interpretation of taste and imagination (Gieryn, in Short, 2015). Space is subjectively different from its content (Lefebvre, in Short, 2015).…”

“…Anthropological research argues that the first 'double built' space is a physical building and the second is a result of interpretation of taste and imagination (Gieryn, in Short, 2015). Space is subjectively different from its content (Lefebvre, in Short, 2015). Lefebvre shows Humans can holistically see space and how the symbolic experience of space is generated.…”

Collaboration in open-plan offices

“…Although there are studies on diverse physical work environments, such as hospitals (Värlander, 2012), factories (Bernstein, 2012), and hairdressing salons (Shortt, 2015), office environments continue to be of substantial interest for researchers who study physical work environments. Many of the significant 1970's and 1980's studies of physical work environments compared cell and open-plan offices (e.g.…”