2005
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2005.9.2319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit groups for relatively hyperbolic groups, II: Makanin-Razborov diagrams

Abstract: Let Γ be a torsion-free group which is hyperbolic relative to a collection of free abelian subgroups. We construct Makanin-Razborov diagrams for Γ. We also prove that every system of equations over Γ is equivalent to a finite subsystem, and a number of structural results about Γ-limit groups.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
84
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exception to this is the proof that the groups under consideration are Hopfian. This result follows immediately from the author's paper [23,Theorem 5.2] (and the proof there does not depend on anything left out of this version of this paper). Since the proof of the Hopf property is technical, and no more enlightening than the proof of [23,Theorem 5.2], we chose to leave this result out of this paper.…”
Section: F65; 20f67 20e08 57m07mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The exception to this is the proof that the groups under consideration are Hopfian. This result follows immediately from the author's paper [23,Theorem 5.2] (and the proof there does not depend on anything left out of this version of this paper). Since the proof of the Hopf property is technical, and no more enlightening than the proof of [23,Theorem 5.2], we chose to leave this result out of this paper.…”
Section: F65; 20f67 20e08 57m07mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This result follows immediately from the author's paper [23,Theorem 5.2] (and the proof there does not depend on anything left out of this version of this paper). Since the proof of the Hopf property is technical, and no more enlightening than the proof of [23,Theorem 5.2], we chose to leave this result out of this paper. Leaving this proof out made it natural to take the results of [22] and the first version of this paper and merge them into this single paper.…”
Section: F65; 20f67 20e08 57m07mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second problem is that the proof of Lemma 3.6 does not apply in this context. Since this paper was written, Groves has solved this problem [11].…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Theorem If ƒ 2 Limmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As R i 's are all torsion-free hyperbolic groups relative to abelian subgroups (see the reference and the explanation in the proof of Lemma 4.1), and the structure of Hom.G; R i / can be described using the Makanin-Razborov diagram by the work of Groves [7] (cf Sela [14] for an original version for free groups). In this sense, Theorem 1.1 implies a uniform description of the structure of homomorphisms from a finitely generated group to torsion-free Kleinian groups of uniformly bounded volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%