2018
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2018.2794764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit of Detection for Five Common Adulterants in Milk: A Study With Different Fat Percent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Raw milk was taken, and then separated into four samples: without contaminant (raw) and adulterated by bicarbonate, urea, and hydrogen peroxide. The percentage of milk contamination was 0.5%, which is a similar value to the frauds found in real applications [ 1 , 4 , 6 ]. The contamination was assisted by São Paulo State Agribusiness Technology Agency (APTA).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Raw milk was taken, and then separated into four samples: without contaminant (raw) and adulterated by bicarbonate, urea, and hydrogen peroxide. The percentage of milk contamination was 0.5%, which is a similar value to the frauds found in real applications [ 1 , 4 , 6 ]. The contamination was assisted by São Paulo State Agribusiness Technology Agency (APTA).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Nowadays, industry and science have grown attention to develop sensors aimed to guarantee the quality control in the food industry, avoiding several types of food adulteration. In this context, due to its high nutritional value, bovine milk is an important component of human nutrition and is used in several processes in the food industry [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. However, the increased demand has also made it prone to fraudulent activity, and numerous adulteration cases have been reported in the last decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common adulterants mixed with pure milk are detergents, ammonium sulphate, and sodium hydroxide sodium bicarbonate, salt. Paper [1] distinguishes the adulterants based on the method of Minimum Detectable Limit. An impedance sensor is used which is sensitive to ionic concentration of the medium and provides us with different phase angles of Impedance when dipped in different adulterants in milk.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chakraborty et al. claimed to have built a low‐cost and portable instrument by using the measured impedance phase capable of detecting five types of adulterants (NaOH, NaHCO 3 , (NH4) 2 SO 4 , and NaCl) in milk with different fat content (1.5% to 20%) [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. The impedance sensor used was a hardwood rod with two back‐to‐back copper electrodes coated on epoxy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%