2010
DOI: 10.1002/asmb.863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit of hazard rate function of coherent system with discrete life

Abstract: In this paper we study the limiting behavior of the hazard rate function of a coherent system S whose components are independent and have discrete lifetimes. The lifetime of the system S can be viewed as the lifetime of a parallel system consisting of the series systems obtained from the minimal paths of S. If we appropriately interpret the 'strongest' minimal path(s) of the system S, it will be shown that the limit of the hazard rate functions of S is the same as that of the 'strongest' path(s) of S. The appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they obtain distribution‐free ordering properties used to compare systems having different numbers of exchangeable components. Other ordering properties and bounds for systems were obtained in . Unfortunately, Samaniego's representation does not necessarily hold when the components are not exchangeable (see Example 5.1 in ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they obtain distribution‐free ordering properties used to compare systems having different numbers of exchangeable components. Other ordering properties and bounds for systems were obtained in . Unfortunately, Samaniego's representation does not necessarily hold when the components are not exchangeable (see Example 5.1 in ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently Mi [13] considered the situation in which the components of the system had discrete lifetimes and investigated some of aging properties of the system. The aim of the present paper is to study the MRL of ( ) …”
Section: T T T T T R K K Nmentioning
confidence: 99%