2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit of stokesian settling concentration characterizes sludge settling velocity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter correlated well with the ISV values of these activated sludge types. LOSS was shown to be a more accurate tool when compared to ISV and sSVI 30 when characterizing hindered settling rates (Mancell-Egala, 2016). The seed had the best settling characteristics with superior sSVI 30 , ISV, and LOSS when compared to the other 5 sludge types.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The latter correlated well with the ISV values of these activated sludge types. LOSS was shown to be a more accurate tool when compared to ISV and sSVI 30 when characterizing hindered settling rates (Mancell-Egala, 2016). The seed had the best settling characteristics with superior sSVI 30 , ISV, and LOSS when compared to the other 5 sludge types.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…TOF and LOSS measurements take into consideration the solids concentration, and measure the transitional concentration. Transitional concentrations were first used successfully as a hindered settling metric and have proven to be more accurate than ISV (Mancell-Egala et al, 2016). By accounting for the differences in stokesian and non-stokesian dynamics, hindered settling measurements were less skewed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As can be seen from Figure 6.1, this threshold concentration depends on the flocculation state of the sludge. For secondary sludge the transition typically occurs at concentrations of 600 -700 mg TSS L -1 whereas for granular sludge the threshold concentration can go up to 1,600-5,500 mg TSS L -1 (depending on the granulation state) (Mancell-Egala et al, 2016). Above this threshold, each particle is hindered by the other particles and the inter-particle forces are sufficiently strong to drag each particle along at the same velocity, irrespective of size and density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%