2011
DOI: 10.1090/s0065-9266-2010-00626-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit operators, collective compactness, and the spectral theory of infinite matrices

Abstract: In the first half of this text we explore the interrelationships between the abstract theory of limit operators (see e.g. the recent monographs of Rabinovich, Roch and Silbermann [85] and Lindner [63]) and the concepts and results of the generalised collectively compact operator theory introduced by Chandler-Wilde and Zhang [26]. We build up to results obtained by applying this generalised collectively compact operator theory to the set of limit operators of an operator A (its operator spectrum). In the second… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
117
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(305 reference statements)
0
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We collect several background notions in operator algebra theory and establish our settings in this section. See [3,10] for more information.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collect several background notions in operator algebra theory and establish our settings in this section. See [3,10] for more information.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third generation works in cases where σ ess (A) can have gaps. This approach appeared (more or less independently) in Chandler-Wilde-Lindner [86,87], Georgescu-Iftimovici [186], Last-Simon [411,412], Mǎntoiu [440] and Rabinovich [488]. Perhaps the cleanest result from [412] With the HVZ theorem in hand, one can easily carry Kato's argument to its logical conclusion Theorem 11.9 (Simon [569]) Let H be an N -body Hamiltonian with center of mass removed.…”
Section: (C) Is the Intracluster Interaction And I (C) The Interclumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, consider U (C) on K given by (7). For any C ∈ U (4), x ⊗ τ |U (C) 2n+1 x ⊗ τ = 0 for any n ∈ Z and x ⊗ τ ∈ K, because U (C) is offdiagonal.…”
Section: Spectral Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the spectral theory of non-self-adjoint operators has been the object of many works, in various setups of regimes, as can be seen from the papers [6][7][8][10][11][12]16,31,32,34] and references therein. In particular, several analyses of non-self-adjoint operators focus on tri-diagonal operators, when expressed in a certain basis; see [7,8,10,11]. Since Jacobi matrices provide generic models of self-adjoint operators, it is quite natural to deal with non-self-adjoint tri-diagonal matrices which are deformations of Jacobi matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%