2015
DOI: 10.1090/bull/1512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit shapes, real and imagined

Abstract: Abstract. This is an introductory discussion of limit shapes, in particular for random partitions and stepped surfaces, and of their applications to supersymmetric gauge theories.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a sense, this issue is complementary to a large body of works, see for instance [16,14,22,30] and references to later papers, and also a recent review [32], which focus on study of the corners of zero or low temperature microscopic crystals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In a sense, this issue is complementary to a large body of works, see for instance [16,14,22,30] and references to later papers, and also a recent review [32], which focus on study of the corners of zero or low temperature microscopic crystals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A perfect matching is equivalent to a tiling of R 2 by three types of lozenges, one type for each of the three edges incident to each vertex. Using a natural height function, such a lozenge tiling gives a surface, and the study of the statistical properties of such random surfaces has resulted in many remarkable discoveries (see Okounkov's survey [29] or Gorin's detailed account of lozenge tilings [16]). Kasteleyn discovered that by cleverly assigning signs to the edges of H, he could compute the number of perfect matchings on a finite approximation using periodic boundary conditions by a determinant formula.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with equality if and only if in the expansion (18), d j = 0, for all j : q |j, for some integer q ≥ 2. This says that in the case of equality, the condition (33) of Theorem 2 does not hold, which leads to |φ n ( p q )| = 1, in contradiction to the condition (68).…”
Section: • Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%