The Refinement of Econometric Estimation and Test Procedures 2007
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511493157.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit Theory for Moderate Deviations From a Unit Root Under Weak Dependence

Abstract: An asymptotic theory is given for autoregressive time series with weakly dependent innovations and a root of the form ρ n = 1+c/n α , involving moderate deviations from unity when α ∈ (0, 1) and c ∈ R are constant parameters. The limit theory combines a functional law to a diffusion on D[0, ∞) and a central limit theorem. For c > 0, the limit theory of the first order serial correlation coefficient is Cauchy and is invariant to both the distribution and the dependence structure of the innovations. To our knowl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When c40, the signal of the moderately explosive regressor y tÀ1 is strong enough to allow for serially correlated errors without affecting the Cauchy limit theory of Theorem 4.3. In subsequent work, Phillips and Magdalinos (2005) extend Theorem 4.3 for moderately explosive processes with linear process errors u t ¼ P 1 j¼0 c j e tÀj , where e t is a sequence of i.i.d. ð0; s 2 Þ random variables and c j is a sequence of constants satisfying P 1 j¼1 jjc j jo1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When c40, the signal of the moderately explosive regressor y tÀ1 is strong enough to allow for serially correlated errors without affecting the Cauchy limit theory of Theorem 4.3. In subsequent work, Phillips and Magdalinos (2005) extend Theorem 4.3 for moderately explosive processes with linear process errors u t ¼ P 1 j¼0 c j e tÀj , where e t is a sequence of i.i.d. ð0; s 2 Þ random variables and c j is a sequence of constants satisfying P 1 j¼1 jjc j jo1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Giraitis and Phillips (2006) prove a version of Theorem 3.2 for martingale difference errors with constant conditional variance E F ntÀ1 ðu 2 t Þ ¼ s 2 for all t. Serial correlation in the errors, however, induces an asymptotic bias forr n and contributes to the variance of the Gaussian limiting distribution. For linear process innovations u t ¼ P 1 j¼0 c j e tÀj as above with Ee 4 1 o1, Phillips and Magdalinos (2005) derive an expression for the asymptotic bias ofr n and provide formulae for the asymptotic variance of the normalized and centered serial correlation coefficient. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, (1.2) is a set valued result which holds for all ρ in a region whose width ultimately depends on the sample size n. It follows from (1.2) that standard asymptotic estimation and inferential theory applies over the whole region of ρ for which (1.2) holds. Similarly, in more general autoregressions than (1.1) and linear regressions where moderate deviations from a unit root occur, asymptotic normality will prevail although the rate of convergence may increase or slow down depending on the value of ρ and bias effects may emerge because of endogeneity in the regressors (Phillips and Magdalinos, 2007b;Magdalinos and Phillips, 2008). The present paper seeks to explore generalizations of (1.2) for sample mean, autocovariance and autocorrelation functions near the boundary of stationarity and under a wider class of models that allow for linear process errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key question is to study the limiting behavior of φ n when φ n is near to one. In the recent years, some theories for the inference for nearly unit root processes have been established, see for example [2], [3], [13], [14] and the references therein. To the best of our knowledge, however, limit theory for a nearly unit root process with GARCH errors has not been discussed in the literature.…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%