2006
DOI: 10.1109/imtc.2006.328575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations in the Use of R.M.S. Value in Power Quality Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[3], the error in the computation of the magnitude of short duration voltage dips using the U rms(1/2) method can be of such a magnitude that the voltage dip might go undetected, because under these conditions the detection threshold might not be surpassed. However, voltage dips of Table 2 Maximum error in the magnitude of voltage dips of 0.5, 0.75 and 1 cycles using the U rms (1/2) any magnitude, duration and point-on-the-wave of beginning are always detected using the EKF method proposed.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3], the error in the computation of the magnitude of short duration voltage dips using the U rms(1/2) method can be of such a magnitude that the voltage dip might go undetected, because under these conditions the detection threshold might not be surpassed. However, voltage dips of Table 2 Maximum error in the magnitude of voltage dips of 0.5, 0.75 and 1 cycles using the U rms (1/2) any magnitude, duration and point-on-the-wave of beginning are always detected using the EKF method proposed.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U rms(1/2) method is simple and easy to implement, but shows a limited performance in the detection and in the estimation of magnitude and duration, mainly for short duration and less severe voltage dips [3]. Using the U rms(1/2) value, the magnitude of a voltage dip is exactly computed only when the duration of the voltage dip is greater than the sampling window used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synchronization of sampling to the power frequency is not necessary, as the difference between synchronized and non-synchronized rms measurements is small [2]. On the other hand, determination of the start and end instants is inaccurate, as the rms voltage may take up to one cycle to transition from the pre-event to the duringevent values [5]. Reference [6] proposes to reduce the sliding window length to half-cycle to improve the accuracy; its main advantage is a faster transition between steady-state and sag/swell voltage values.…”
Section: A Estimation Methods Using Threshold Rms Voltagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the RMS method is simple, well known, and easy to implement. On the other hand, the limitations in the use of RMS values in power quality analysis from the point of view of the IEC standard have been clearly overviewed [21,22]. In a single-phase, the major drawbacks that affect both the performance feasibility and the accuracy of results are:…”
Section: Discrete Rms Value Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform this experiment, a general purpose ATmega328P microcontroller-based prototype, as given in [22], was built and configured with a clock frequency of 16 MHz. The selected sampling frequency was 1 kHz, i.e., a 20 samples per AC voltage signal period, and the programmed procedure fit what is described in Figure 1 and in Equation 3.…”
Section: Contrast Experiment: Expanding the Samples Vector And Employmentioning
confidence: 99%