2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2010.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of Biomarkers Serum Levels During Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent publication, Wojcik et al propose that CK-MB is not a good biomarker for quantitative determination of myocardial injury produced by radiofrequency energy, because of its instability at temperatures above 40 • C. The authors explain that only cardiac troponins reflect myocardial injury and should be used for comparison between both ablation procedures. 15 In this sense, the present study shows higher TnI levels after cryoablation procedure versus RF. This finding supports our hypothesis of different lesion formation between cryoablation and RF.…”
Section: Figure 2 Relative Serum Levels Of Biomarkers In Patients Wisupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In a recent publication, Wojcik et al propose that CK-MB is not a good biomarker for quantitative determination of myocardial injury produced by radiofrequency energy, because of its instability at temperatures above 40 • C. The authors explain that only cardiac troponins reflect myocardial injury and should be used for comparison between both ablation procedures. 15 In this sense, the present study shows higher TnI levels after cryoablation procedure versus RF. This finding supports our hypothesis of different lesion formation between cryoablation and RF.…”
Section: Figure 2 Relative Serum Levels Of Biomarkers In Patients Wisupporting
confidence: 60%
“…As several markers have been proven to be useful for diagnosis and evaluation of size of myocardial injury after acute ischemic episode, many authors tried to implement different biomarkers to evaluate and quantify the size of effective ablation lesions [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. On one hand, previous studies have univocally shown humoral biomarkers for myocardial injury to be elevated after radiofrequency (RF) ablation, depending on the amount of energy delivered and the site of ablation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, previous studies have univocally shown humoral biomarkers for myocardial injury to be elevated after radiofrequency (RF) ablation, depending on the amount of energy delivered and the site of ablation [5]. On the other hand, contrasting data exist about myocardial injury biomarker trend after cryoablation procedures [6][7][8][9]. Furthermore, to date, no data have been available on these biomarkers after laser balloon ablation or after RF catheter ablation with the assistance of contact-force-sensing technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) is released when myocardial cell death occurs and the level detectable in the bloodstream correlates with the mass of necrotic cardiac myocytes . Serum cTnT is the most reliable marker of myocardial damage after AF ablation . The high‐sensitivity assay (HScTnT) is an order of magnitude more sensitive than previously available commercial assays .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%