“…In a recent publication, Wojcik et al propose that CK-MB is not a good biomarker for quantitative determination of myocardial injury produced by radiofrequency energy, because of its instability at temperatures above 40 • C. The authors explain that only cardiac troponins reflect myocardial injury and should be used for comparison between both ablation procedures. 15 In this sense, the present study shows higher TnI levels after cryoablation procedure versus RF. This finding supports our hypothesis of different lesion formation between cryoablation and RF.…”
Section: Figure 2 Relative Serum Levels Of Biomarkers In Patients Wisupporting
We show higher levels of necrosis and myocardial injury biomarker after cryoablation versus RF. However, we found higher remodeling processes after RF. Our data support previous publications showing different lesion formation in cryoablation and RF.
“…In a recent publication, Wojcik et al propose that CK-MB is not a good biomarker for quantitative determination of myocardial injury produced by radiofrequency energy, because of its instability at temperatures above 40 • C. The authors explain that only cardiac troponins reflect myocardial injury and should be used for comparison between both ablation procedures. 15 In this sense, the present study shows higher TnI levels after cryoablation procedure versus RF. This finding supports our hypothesis of different lesion formation between cryoablation and RF.…”
Section: Figure 2 Relative Serum Levels Of Biomarkers In Patients Wisupporting
We show higher levels of necrosis and myocardial injury biomarker after cryoablation versus RF. However, we found higher remodeling processes after RF. Our data support previous publications showing different lesion formation in cryoablation and RF.
“…As several markers have been proven to be useful for diagnosis and evaluation of size of myocardial injury after acute ischemic episode, many authors tried to implement different biomarkers to evaluate and quantify the size of effective ablation lesions [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. On one hand, previous studies have univocally shown humoral biomarkers for myocardial injury to be elevated after radiofrequency (RF) ablation, depending on the amount of energy delivered and the site of ablation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, previous studies have univocally shown humoral biomarkers for myocardial injury to be elevated after radiofrequency (RF) ablation, depending on the amount of energy delivered and the site of ablation [5]. On the other hand, contrasting data exist about myocardial injury biomarker trend after cryoablation procedures [6][7][8][9]. Furthermore, to date, no data have been available on these biomarkers after laser balloon ablation or after RF catheter ablation with the assistance of contact-force-sensing technology.…”
“…Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) is released when myocardial cell death occurs and the level detectable in the bloodstream correlates with the mass of necrotic cardiac myocytes . Serum cTnT is the most reliable marker of myocardial damage after AF ablation . The high‐sensitivity assay (HScTnT) is an order of magnitude more sensitive than previously available commercial assays .…”
A high AEQ correlates well with freedom from AT in patients with PAF in both the short and medium term. If confirmed in further studies, AEQ may become a useful marker of risk of AT post-AFA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.