2018
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of ceftriaxone compared with cefazolin against MSSA: an integrated pharmacodynamic analysis

Abstract: Given the limited activity of ceftriaxone against S. aureus, particularly for serious infections when bacterial kill is desired, the convenience of once-daily dosing should be weighed against the risks of using an overly broad, suboptimal therapy. Cefazolin warrants further consideration, particularly as optimal pharmacodynamics against MSSA may be achieved with twice-daily dosing in most patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have multiple targets complicating interpretation of these findings. For example, ceftriaxone inhibits penicillin-binding proteins on the inner membrane of the bacterial cell wall and N-acetylcysteine increases glutathione production (Atkuri et al, 2007;Zelenitsky et al, 2018). Furthermore, ceftriaxone-induced upregulation of GLT-1 expression does not necessarily translate to accelerated glutamate uptake, as one report found that ceftriaxone application had no effect on basal and activity-dependent glutamate clearance (Wilkie et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have multiple targets complicating interpretation of these findings. For example, ceftriaxone inhibits penicillin-binding proteins on the inner membrane of the bacterial cell wall and N-acetylcysteine increases glutathione production (Atkuri et al, 2007;Zelenitsky et al, 2018). Furthermore, ceftriaxone-induced upregulation of GLT-1 expression does not necessarily translate to accelerated glutamate uptake, as one report found that ceftriaxone application had no effect on basal and activity-dependent glutamate clearance (Wilkie et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapy which was too narrow included "inadequate" cover for water-immersed wounds, the use of only anti-staphylococcal penicillins for cat and dog bites and the use of ceftriaxone monotherapy (which has limited anti-staphylococcal activity) (Zelenitsky et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies investigating pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of ceftriaxone in critically ill patients have suggested that there is substantial risk of failure to maintain adequate antibiotic concentrations against S. aureus in all patients with standard ceftriaxone dosing of 2 g once daily. 2 , 4 Therefore, EUCAST recommends a dosage of 2 g twice daily for S. aureus infections. 17 In our study, the majority of patients in the ceftriaxone group received 2 g once daily and no difference in bacteraemia duration was observed in comparison with flucloxacillin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses and one clinical study, there are concerns that, in contrast to cefuroxime therapy, standard once-daily dosing of ceftriaxone does not lead to adequate antibiotic exposure in SAB and therefore results in suboptimal patient outcomes. 2–4 Cefuroxime and ceftriaxone have never been directly compared as empirical treatment of MSSA bacteraemia. Therefore, in this study we aimed to determine the effectiveness of empirical antibiotic treatment with flucloxacillin, cefuroxime and ceftriaxone in adult patients with subsequent microbiologically proven MSSA bacteraemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%