2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2006.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of pH-potentiometric titration for the determination of the degree of deacetylation of chitosan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The resultant titration curve shows two equivalence points: the first one corresponds to the excess hydrogen chloride, while the second corresponds to the protonated chitosans. Thus, the difference between them would correspond to the free deacetylated amino groups (Balazs & Sipos, 2007;Sweidan et al, 2011). For the two equivalence points (inflection points) of the titration curve, let us determine the volume of sodium hydroxide aqueous solution employed to reach these point.…”
Section: Deacetylation Degreementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant titration curve shows two equivalence points: the first one corresponds to the excess hydrogen chloride, while the second corresponds to the protonated chitosans. Thus, the difference between them would correspond to the free deacetylated amino groups (Balazs & Sipos, 2007;Sweidan et al, 2011). For the two equivalence points (inflection points) of the titration curve, let us determine the volume of sodium hydroxide aqueous solution employed to reach these point.…”
Section: Deacetylation Degreementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moisture and ash contents have to be determined and the weighed chitosan mass corrected. Low grade samples are not adequately measured by potentiometric titration (Balázs & Sipos, 2007;Zhanga et al, 2011).…”
Section: Potentiometric Titrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Elemental analysis (Davies & Hayes, 1988;dos Santos et al, 2009); • Titration (Arcidiacono & Kaplan, 1992;Balázs & Sipos, 2007;de Alvarenga et al, 2010;Hattori et al, 1999;Park et al, 1983;Raymond et al, 1993;Tôei & Kohara, 1976;Zhanga et al, 2011); • Hydrolytic methods (Davies & Hayes, 1988;Nanjo et al, 1991;Niola et al, 1993;Sato et al, 1998;Zamani et al, 2008); • HPLC -Ultraviolet (Aiba, 1986;Muzzarelli & Rocchetti, 1985); • Infrared (Baxter et al, 1992;Duarte et al, 2002;Kasaai, 2008;Miya et al, 1980;Moore & Roberts, 1980;Sannan et al, 1978); • 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance (Brugnerotto et al, 2001;de Alvarenga et al, 2010;Fernandez-Megia et al, 2005;Lavertu et al, 2003;Varum et al, 1991); • CP-MAS 13 C NMR (Heux et al, 2000;Manni et al, 2010;Raymond et al, 1993); • CP-MAS 15 N NMR (Kasaai, 2009;Yu et al, 1999); • Many other methods are described in the literature but with a somewhat smaller appeal. Some of these methods are: steric exclusion chromatography (Brugnerotto et al, 2001), nitrous acid deamination (Sashiwa et al, 1991), thermal analysis (Garcia Alonso et al, 1983), gas chromatography with columns packed with chitin and chitosan (Muzzarelli et al, 1980),...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of its deacetylation degree is important to characterize chitosan. The measurement methods of the deacetylation degree of chitosan include NMR, [5][6][7] IR, 8 acid base titration, 9,10 and colloidal titration. [11][12][13] Colloidal titration on which chitosan stoichiometrically reacts with potassium PVS is one of the most conventional methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%