1998
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1998.16.8.2632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of specific reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction markers in the detection of metastases in the lymph nodes and blood of breast cancer patients.

Abstract: CEA, CK-19, GA733.2, and MUC-1 show no diagnostic value as mRNA markers for the detection of micrometastases by the RT-PCR assay because they are expressed in the blood and lymph nodes of patients without cancer. Further studies are needed to assess the sensitivity of CK-20 to detect micrometastases by the RT-PCR assay in the blood and frozen-section SNs of patients with breast cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
200
2
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
200
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…So far no expression of HMGI-C in the peripheral blood of healthy controls could be found, which is of advantage, since the specificity of other RT -PCR assays in breast cancer, such as RT -PCR for cytokeratin 19, had to be questioned due to an expression in healthy controls (Bostick et al, 1998;Slade et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far no expression of HMGI-C in the peripheral blood of healthy controls could be found, which is of advantage, since the specificity of other RT -PCR assays in breast cancer, such as RT -PCR for cytokeratin 19, had to be questioned due to an expression in healthy controls (Bostick et al, 1998;Slade et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 However, high rates of false positive control samples using tissue specific markers, including CK19, have been reported previously. [35][36][37][38] This is often due to illegitimate transcription. 39 It is, thus, not possible to discriminate between low levels of illegitimate expression in normal cells from high levels of expression in a few tumour cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telomerase detection on HEC may be more specific compared to other described techniques involving epithelial specific genes (Bostick et al, 1998;Ghossein et al, 1998;Jung et al, 1999) because it allows a direct detection of a marker of epithelial tumour cells. However, further studies should be performed to demonstrate the value of this non-invasive method in determining diagnostic, prognostic and response to therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR and RT-PCR have been shown to be of great interest for the detection of chromosomal alteration specific of some haematological malignancies or non-epithelial tumours. Methods, which have been developed for the detection of epithelium-derived cancer cells are primarily based on the amplification of tissue or lineage specific genes (Bostick et al, 1998;Ghossein et al, 1998;Jung et al, 1999). Therefore, due in part to the occurrence of circulating normal epithelial cells, they fail to be specific for the detection of circulating carcinoma cell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%